Page 75 - Biofuels for a More Sustainable Future
P. 75

Triple bottom line, sustainability and sustainability assessment, an overview  67


              considering the entire biofuel life cycle and a multiplicity of environmental
              and social indicators. However, to ensure that even a more comprehensive
              and strategic assessment is performed key concepts should be taken into
              account. Assessing biofuels against the carrying capacity of ecosystems,
              the planetary boundaries, the nexus concept, potential of using more sec-
              ondary materials for biofuels production in a circular bioeconomy are essen-
              tial for achieving sustainable development goals for the environmental
              dimension. Similarly, a full supply chain approach is needed for assessing
              socioeconomic benefits and burdens, including externalities, spillovers,
              and rebound effects.




              References
              Acheampong, M., Ertem, F.C., Kappler, B., Neubauer, P., 2017. In pursuit of sustainable
                 development goal (SDG) number 7: will biofuels be reliable? Renew. Sust. Energ.
                 Rev. 75, 927–937.
              Baudry, G., Delrue, F., Legrand, J., Pruvost, J., Vall ee, T., 2017. The challenge of measuring
                 biofuel sustainability: a stakeholder-driven approach applied to the French case. Renew.
                 Sust. Energ. Rev. 69, 933–947.
              Bell, S., Morse, S., 2008. Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the immeasurable? Earthscan,
                 London, p. 256.
              Bellezoni, R.A., Sharma, D., Villela, A.A., Junior, A.O.P., 2018. Water-energy-food nexus
                 of sugarcane ethanol production in the state of Goia ´s, Brazil: an analysis with regional
                 input-output matrix. Biomass Bioenergy 115, 108–119.
              Bhardwaj, A., Joshi, M., Khosla, R., Dubash, N.K., 2019. More priorities, more problems?
                 Decision-making with multiple energy, development and climate objectives. Energy
                 Res. Soc. Sci. 49, 143–157.
              Bond, A.J., Dockerty, T., Lovett, A., Riche, A.B., Haughton, A.J., Bohan, D.A., Sage, R.B.,
                 Shield, I.F., Finch, J.W., Turner, M.M., Karp, A., 2011. Learning how to deal with
                 values, frames and governance in sustainability appraisal. Reg. Stud. 45 (8), 1157–1170.
              Boulay, A.M., Bare, J., Benini, L., Berger, M., Lathuillie `re, M.J., Manzardo, A., Margni, M.,
                 Motoshita, M., Nu ´n ˜ez, M., Pastor, A.V., Ridoutt, B., Oki, T., Worbe, S., Pfister, S.,
                 2018. The WULCA consensus characterization model for water scarcity footprints:
                 assessing impacts of water consumption based on available water remaining
                 (AWARE). Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 23 (2), 368–378.
              Buchanan, J., Stubblebine, C., 1962. Externality. Economica 29 (116), 371–384. https://doi.
                 org/10.2307/2551386.
              CEC, 2008. Sustainable Consumption and Production and Sustainable Industrial Policy
                 Action Plan. Communication from the Commission COM (2008) 397/3.
              CEC, 2009. Mainstreaming Sustainable Development Into EU policies: 2009 Review of the
                 European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development. COM (400) 2009, European
                 Commission, Brussels.
              CEC, 2012. Innovating for Sustainable Growth: A Bioeconomy for Europe Communication
                 From the Commission. COM (2012) 60.
              CEC, 2013a. Building the Single Market for Green Products-Facilitating Better Information
                 on the Environmental Performance of Products and Organisations. Communication
                 From the Commission COM (2013) 196.
   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80