Page 76 - Biofuels for a More Sustainable Future

68 Biofuels for a More Sustainable Future

CEC, 2013b. Commission Recommendation of 9 April 2013 on the Use of Common
Methods to Measure and Communicate the Life Cycle Environmental Performance
of Products and Organisations 2013/179/EU. Brussels.
CEC, 2015a. Better Regulation For Better Results—An EU Agenda. Communication From
the Commission COM (2015) 215.
CEC, 2015b. Better Regulation Toolbox. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/
guidelines/toc_tool_en.htm.
CEC, 2016. Next Steps for a Sustainable European Future European Action for Sustainabil-
ity. Communication From the Commission COM(2016) 739.
CEC, 2018. A Sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the Connection Between
Economy, Society and the Environment. Communication From the Commission
COM/2018/673.
CEC (Communication European Commission), 2001. A Sustainable Europe for a Better
World: A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development. COM (264) 2001.
Chaudhary, A., Pfister, S., Hellweg, S., 2016. Spatially explicit analysis of biodiversity loss
due to global agriculture, pasture and forest land use from a producer and consumer
perspective. Environ. Sci. Technol. 50 (7), 3928–3936.
Clift, R., Sim, S., King, H., Chenoweth, J.L., Christie, I., Clavreul, J., et al., 2017. The
challenges of applying planetary boundaries as a basis for strategic decision-making in
companies with global supply chains. Sustainability 9 (2), 279.
Corrado, S., Sala, S., 2018. Bioeconomy contribution to circular economy. In: Benetto, E.,
Gericke, K. (Eds.), Designing Sustainable Technologies, Products and Policies. From
Science to Innovation. Springer, Cham, Switzerland. ISBN 978-3-319-66980-9,
pp. 49–59.
Corrado, S., Zampori, L., Castellani, V., Sala, S., 2018. Systematic analysis of secondary life
cycle inventories when modelling agricultural production: a case study for arable crops.
J. Clean. Prod. 172, 3990–4000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.179.
Crenna, E., Polce, C., Sala, S., Collina, E., 2017. Pollinators in life cycle assessment: towards a
framework for impact assessment. J. Clean. Prod. 140 (2), 525–536. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.058.
Crenna, E., Sozzo, S., Sala, S., 2018. Natural biotic resources in LCA: towards an impact
assessment model for sustainable supply chain management. J. Clean. Prod.
172, 3669–3684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.208.
Curran, M., Maia de Souza, D., Anto ´n, A., Teixeira, R.F.M., Michelsen, O., Vidal-
Legaz, B., Sala, S., Canals, M.I., 2016. How well does LCA model land use impacts
on biodiversity?—a comparison with approaches from ecology and conservation.
Environ. Sci. Technol. 50 (6), 2782–2795. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b04681.
De Laurentiis, V., Secchi, M., Bos, U., Horn, R., Laurent, A., Sala, S., 2019. Soil quality
index: exploring options for a comprehensive assessment of land use impacts in LCA
(Submitted for publication). J. Clean. Prod. 215, 63–74. https://www.sciencedirect.
com/science/article/pii/S095965261833960X.
Demirbas, A., 2009. Political, economic and environmental impacts of biofuels: a review.
Appl. Energy 86, S108–S117.
Devuyst, D., 2001. How Green Is the City? Sustainability Assessment and the Management
of Urban Environments. Columbia University Press, New York, p. 457.
Di Cesare, S., Silveri, F., Sala, S., Petti, L., 2018. Positive impacts in Social Life Cycle Assess-
ment: state of the art and the way forward. Int. J. LCA 23 (3), 406–421. https://doi.org/
10.1007/s11367-016-1169-7.
EC (European Commission), 2017. PEFCR Guidance Document—Guidance for the
development of Product Environmental Footprint Category Rules (PEFCRs),
version 6.3, December 2017. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/
smgp/pdf/PEFCR_guidance_v6.3.pdf.