Page 72 - Biomimetics : Biologically Inspired Technologies
P. 72

Bar-Cohen : Biomimetics: Biologically Inspired Technologies DK3163_c003 Final Proof page 58 21.9.2005 11:40pm




                    58                                      Biomimetics: Biologically Inspired Technologies


                        3.A.6  Action Commands .................................................................................................................. 118
                        3.A.7  Discussion ............................................................................................................................... 123
                    Acknowledgements......................................................................................................................................... 125




                                                 3.1  INTRODUCTION

                    This chapter describes the state of the art in creating animal cognition in machines. It begins
                    with a discussion of the two fundamental processes of cognitive knowledge acquisition — training
                    and education. The subsequent sections then present some ideas for building key components
                    of cognition (language, sound, and vision). The main point of this chapter is to illustrate how
                    we can now proceed towards the mechanization of key elements of cognition. This chapter
                    assumes that the reader is familiar with the concepts, terminology, and mathematics of elem-
                    entary confabulation (as described in Hecht-Nielsen, 2005) and its hypothesized biological
                    implementation in the human cerebral cortex and thalamus (as described in the Appendix of this
                    chapter).

                    3.1.1 Mechanized Cognition: The Most Important Piece of AI

                    As discussed in Section 3.A.1 of the Appendix, human (and higher mammal) intelligence involves
                    a number of strongly interacting, but functionally distinct brain structures. Of these, significant
                    progress has now been made on three: cerebral cortex and thalamus (the engine of cognition — and
                    the focus of this chapter), basal ganglia (the behavioral manager of the brain — which manages
                    action evaluation, action selection, and skill learning), and cerebellum (the autopilot of the brain —
                    which implements detailed control of routine movement and thought processes with little or no
                    need for ongoing cognitive involvement once a process has been launched and until it needs to be
                    terminated). There are a number of other, smaller-scale, brain functions that are also critical for
                    intelligence (e.g., ongoing drive and goal state determination by the limbic system), but these will
                    not be discussed here.
                       Of all of the components of intelligence, cognition is, by far, the most important. It is also the
                    one that has, until now, completely resisted explanation. This chapter provides the first sketch of
                    how cognition can be mechanized. The approach is based upon the author’s theory of vertebrate
                    cognition, which is described in the chapter’s Appendix. This chapter is not a historical description
                    of ‘‘how cognition was mechanized’’; but is instead an ‘‘initial plan for mechanizing cognition.’’
                    Initial progress in implementing this plan in areas such as language and hearing (the subjects of
                    Sections 3.3 and 3.4) has been encouraging.

                    3.1.2 Lexicon Capabilities

                    This chapter considers some more sophisticated variants of confabulation that go beyond elemen-
                    tary confabulation. Each lexicon used in our (technological) cognitive architectures (collections of
                    lexicons and knowledge bases) will be assumed to possess the machinery for carrying out each of
                    these confabulation variants (or information processing effects — the term that will be used for
                    them here), as described below. Thus, from now on, the term lexicon implies a capability for
                    implementing a finite set of symbols, maintaining a list of the excitation states of those symbols,
                    and for executing the effects defined below. For the moment, lexicon dynamics will be ignored.
                    (However, in later sections, concepts such as consensus building and symbol interpolation, which
                    intrinsically require lexicon dynamical behavior, will be briefly mentioned.)
                       One very important detail that was not discussed in Hecht-Nielsen (2005), and only briefly
                    discussed in the Appendix (because it is not relevant to the biological implementation of elementary
   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77