Page 41 - Biosystems Engineering
P. 41

22    Cha pte r  O n e

                   Linear equations attempt to solve a weight matrix that represents a
               series of linear equations of the expression level of each gene as a func-
               tion of the other genes. Unfortunately, there need to be as many time
               points as there are genes to develop a unique solution. When there is no
               unique solution, we cannot know if the model derived from a linear
               equation is correct. Differential equations model the expression level of
               genes as a function of other genes and their rates of change. The solution
               involves itself in solving for the constants in the differential equations.
               Unfortunately, this suffers from the same problem as linear equations.
               Boolean networks assume that genes are either “on” or “off” and attempt
               to solve the state transitions for the system. Assuming that genes are
               only in one of two states, however, is an oversimplification, although
               methods have been developed to get around the simplification.
                   Woolf and Wang (2000) introduced an approach based on fuzzy rules
               of a known activator/repressor model of gene interaction. Their algo-
               rithm transforms expression values into qualitative descriptors that can
               be evaluated by using a set of heuristic rules. Figure 1.9a shows the mem-
               bership function used by the fuzzy logic–based model. The model finds
               triplets of activators, repressors, and targets in gene expression data by
               checking all possible triplets of genes if they fit to the fuzzy logic–based
               model governed by the rule-base decision matrix shown in Fig. 1.9b.
                   Woolf and Wang used data from the Saccharomyces cerevisiae cell
               cycle expression database (Cho et al. 1998) to test their model. The
               data consisted of 6321 time series gene expression profiles. Each
               gene expression profile represents expression levels of a gene at
               17 time steps, thus forming a 6321 × 17 matrix. Using a normalized
               subset of this matrix, 1898 × 17, Cho et al. (1998) tested every
               possible combination of activators, repressors, and targets if they fit
               the fuzzy model. The model’s output was compared to the expression


                                                        If repressor is
                                                    High    Med    Low
                                                   Target  Target  Target
                                                 Low  is     is     is
                                                                   Med
                                                            Low
                                                    Low
              1                                    Target  Target  Target
            Membership  0.5  Low  Med  High   If activator is  Med  Target  Target  Target
                                                             is
                                                     is
                                                                    is
                                                            Med
                                                    Low
                                                                   High
                                                 High
                                                             is
                                                                    is
                                                     is
                                                    Med    High    High
               0            0.5           1
                        Expression level
                            (a)                             (b)
          FIGURE 1.9  Membership function and (a) rule base decision matrix (b).
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46