Page 258 - Bridge and Highway Structure Rehabilitation and Repair
P. 258

CHAPTER 5                         LOAD AND RESISTANCE FACTOR RATING AND REDESIGN            233



        Table 5.10a  Frequently used computer programs for superstructures (continued).
        Program I.D.                        Authors             Web Site/E-Mail**
        DESCUS                              OPTI-MATE, Inc.     www.opti-mate.com
        Merlin-DASH
        GT STRUDL                           Georgia Tech CASE Center www.gtstrudl.gatech.edu

        STAAD.Pro                           Bentley Systems Inc.  www.bentley.com
        MicroStation
        AASHTO Virtis (Bridge Load Rating)  AASHTOWare ®        Vigesa@email.msn.com
        **E-mail address is subject to change.

        Table 5.10b  Frequently used computer programs for substructures.
        Program I.D.                        Authors             Web Site/E-Mail
        RC-PIER ®                           Leap Software       www.leapsoft.com
        Merlin-RCWall                       OPTI-MATE, Inc.     www.opti-mate.com
        Sam                                 Bestech Systems Ltd.  www.bestech.co.uk/Bridges@
                                                                bestech.co.uk
        ABLRFD—LRFD Abutment and Retaining Wall   PennDOT       www.dot.state.pa.us
        Analysis and Design
        PAPIER Pier Design
        BXLRFD—LRFD Box Culvert Design
        and Rating
        **E-mail address is subject to change.




        5.11  SOFTWARE FOR SUBSTRUCTURE

            Seismic analysis and design software is listed in Chapter 12.
            Engineers are advised to review and evaluate program defaults and make the necessary

        modifications to ensure that bridge components are designed in accordance with the AASHTO
        design criteria as modified by this section.

            •  Construction loads and procedures—Many failures seem to happen during construction.
              Site organization is based on selection of one general contractor, who in turn selects several
              subcontractors, who have specialized in a particular trade such as concreting, formwork,
              steel fabrication, bearings, reinforcing steel, etc. One of the difficulties is that construction

              practice varies from state to state and from job site to job site.
            •  Current design specifications do not seem to cover in detail construction related design

              for temporary loads. Future construction codes should address issues created by use of
              the latest technology. Technical specifi cations may also be made comprehensive to give
              minute details about construction procedures.
            •  Accelerated bridge construction—Modern construction technology seems to be pulling
              the train on design methods. Precast technology is a world apart from traditional wet
              construction methods. Self-propelled modular transportation (SPMT) has enabled the
              transportation of long span girders without the need for splices.
            •  Connections used for precast methods are different from those used in traditional construc-
              tion.
   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263