Page 20 - Building A Succesful Board-Test Strategy
P. 20

What Is a Test Strategy?  7


    « Service
    * Field returns
    • The company's "image of quality"

    Note that only test, field returns, and service involve testing at all, and field
 returns do so only indirectly. Reducing the number of failures that get to the test
 process or the number of products that fail after shipment to customers also
 simplifies test activities, thereby minimizing costs.
    Test-strategy selection goes far beyond merely choosing test techniques.
 Design issues, for example, include bare-board construction. An engineer once
 described a 50-layer board that was designed in such a way that it could not be easily
 repaired. To avoid the very expensive scrapping of bad boards, his colleagues bor-
 rowed a technique from designers of random access memory (RAM) components
 and large liquid-crystal-display (LCD) panels—they included redundant traces for
 most of the board's internal logic paths. Paths were chosen by soft switches driven
 by on-board components individually programmed for each board.
    Although this solution was expensive, the board's $100,000 price tag made
 such an expensive choice viable, especially because it was the only approach that
 would work. Without the redundancy, board yields would have been unacceptably
 low, and repair was impossible. Unfortunately, the solution created another
 problem. The board's components contained specific instructions to select known-
 good paths. The bare board defied testing without component-level logic. There-
 fore, the engineers created a test fixture that meshed with the sockets on the board
 and mimicked its components. In addition to pass or fail information, the test
 would identify a successful path, then generate the program with which to burn the
 "traffic-cop" devices as part of its output. Including the redundancy as a design
 choice mandated a particular extremely complicated test strategy. Sometimes test-
 strategy choices reduce to "poor" and "none."
    The acceptability of particular test steps depends on whether the strategy is
 for a new or existing facility, product, product line, or technology. In an existing
 facility, is there adequate floor space for expansion? Is the facility already running
 three work shifts, or can a change in strategy involve merely adding a shift?
    Test managers must also decide whether to design their own test equipment
 or buy it from commercial vendors, whether they should try to "make do" with
 existing equipment, and whether new equipment must be the same type or from
 the same manufacturer as the installed base.
    A test strategy's success also depends on aspects of the overall manufactur-
 ing operation. For instance, how does a product move from test station to repair
 station or from one test station to the next? Are there conveyors or other auto-
 mated handlers, or do people transfer material manually? Concurrent-engineering
 principles encourage placing portions of the manufacturing process physically
 close to one another, thereby minimizing bottlenecks and in-transit product
 damage. This arrangement also encourages employees who perform different parts
 of the job to communicate with one another, which tends to increase manufactur-
 ing efficiencies and lower costs.
   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25