Page 55 - Building A Succesful Board-Test Strategy
P. 55

What Is a Test  Strategy?  41


                                     Training-cost impact of
                                        strategy decisions

                  Existing equipment

                  New equipment,
                    same vendors

                  New vendors

                  New test strategy


                  New facility



        Figure 1-1 2  Training costs are inversely related to everyone’s familiarity with various
        test-strategy components.




        easy to manufacture and test will require less ramp-up time and less attention from
        management people, resulting in lower startup costs.
             Initiating  manufacturing  incurs  costs  for  parts,  labor,  holding  work-in-
        process  inventory, and  people  or equipment  to  move  components,  boards,  and
        systems from station  to station  through  the process. Test costs include costs for
        testing components at the vendor, at incoming inspection, or by  a third party, as
        well as costs for board test and system test. Burn-in and ESS introduce their own
        costs, influencing cost distributions at board and system levels.
             One major cost component when introducing a new test strategy is training.
        Operators need to know how to run the equipment, programmers must understand
        the  nuances  and  peculiarities  that  characterize  any  tester,  and  managers  must
        become familiar with the anticipated personality of  the selected test operation as
        well as the nature and value of  resultant data. Training costs are inversely related
        to everyone’s familiarity with various test-strategy components. Relying on exist-
        ing equipment incurs the lowest training costs, establishing a new test facility, the
        highest, as Figure  1-12 shows.
             Another  factor  that  can  significantly  increase  training  costs  is  personnel
        turnover. High turnover demands extra effort to train new people as they come on
        board. Training new people takes longer than training current people, even on an
        entirely new project or test strategy, because current employees are already famil-
        iar with the management personnel, management  style, and other environmental
        aspects of  the corporate personality.
             Involving manufacturing  people in  test-strategy  decision-making and  then
        training them adequately to implement the agreed-on approaches make them more
   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60