Page 58 - Building A Succesful Board-Test Strategy
P. 58

44  BUILDING A SUCCESSFUL BOARD-TEST STRATEGY



          _ Conception  Validation Development Production  Operation  Support












                                   Time
 Figure 1-13  From a study by British Aerospace in the UK. The lower curve indicates
 actual timing of money spent during product development and production ramp-up. The
 upper curve shows the number of dollars committed by design decisions during product
 development. (Prang, Joe. 1992. "Controlling Life-Cycle Costs Through Concurrent
 Engineering," ATE & Instrumentation Conference, Miller-Freeman Trade-Show Division,
 Dallas, Texas.)


 spent during product development and production ramp-up. Notice that, as
 expected, the development stage is relatively inexpensive. Designers rely on com-
 puter equipment and simulations, whereas manufacturing processes require bare
 boards and components, assembly equipment, test equipment, handlers, and
 people.
    Unfortunately, looking only at when money changes hands does not tell the
 whole story. Every design decision commits dollars that manufacturing and test
 operations and other downstream processes must spend. By the end of the valida-
 tion phase, designers have already committed 70 percent of project expenditures,
 85 percent by the time engineering people release a product for manufacturing. The
 difference between the dollars committed and dollars spent are the so-called
 "hidden costs" of the design process. The magnitude of this gap emphasizes the
 value of building design-for-manufacturability, design-for-testability, and other
 concurrent-engineering principles into a product from its conception.
    Chapter 10 will discuss test economics in much more detail.



    1.8 Project Scope

    Considerations for building a successful test strategy depend heavily on the
 object of the exercise. Setting up a new facility, for example, generally means that
 the range of available strategic choices is virtually unlimited. The only criterion for
 vendor, equipment, and test-method evaluation is to achieve the most economical,
 highest-quality product possible within available budget constraints.
    Establishing a new product line in an existing facility can also permit a
 broad spectrum of options, but floor space may be limited. In addition, because
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63