Page 106 -
P. 106

Chapter 2  •  Foundations and Technologies for Decision Making   105

                        for empty containers create uncertainty in the location   increased from a record low of 3.8 cycles in 2009 to 4.8 cycles
                        and availability of containers.              in 2010. Moreover, when the ECO system was implemented in
                       • Information handling and sharing. Huge loads of   2010, the excess cost per full voyage became $35 cheaper than
                        data need to be processed every day. CSAV processes   the average cost for the period between 2006 and 2009. This
                        400,000 container transactions every day. Timely deci-  resulted in cost savings of $101 million on all voyages in 2010.
                        sions based on accurate information had to be gener-  It  was  estimated  that  ECO’s  direct  contribution  to  this  cost
                        ated in order to help reduce safety stocks of empty   reduction was about 80 percent ($81 million). CSAV projected
                        containers.                                  that ECO will help generate $200 million profits over the next
                       • Coordination of interrelated decisions worldwide.   2 years since its implementation in 2010.
                        Previously,  decisions  were  made  at  the  local  level.
                        Consequently, in order to  alleviate the empty container   case Questions
                        problem, decisions regarding movement of empty con-    1.  Explain  why  solving  the  empty  container  logistics
                        tainers at various locations had to be  coordinated.  problem contributes to cost savings for CSAV.
                                                                       2.  What are some of the qualitative benefits of the optimi-
                    methodology/solution                                  zation model for the empty container  movements?
                    CSAV developed an integrated system called Empty Container    3.  What are some of the key benefits of the forecasting
                    Logistics Optimization (ECO) using moving  average, trended   model in the ECO system implemented by CSAV?
                    and seasonal time series, and sales force forecast (CFM) meth-    4.  Perform an online search to determine how other ship-
                    ods. The ECO system comprises a  forecasting model, inven-  ping companies handle the empty container problem.
                    tory model, multi-commodity (MC) network flow model, and   Do you think the ECO system would directly benefit
                    a Web interface. The forecasting model draws data from the   those companies?
                    regional offices,  processes it, and feeds the resultant informa-    5.  Besides shipping logistics, can you think of any other
                    tion to the inventory model. Some of the information the fore-  domain where such a system would be useful in reduc-
                    casting model generates are the space in the vessel for empty   ing cost?
                    containers and  container demand.  The forecasting  module
                    also helps reduce forecast error and, hence, allows CSAV’s   What We can Learn from this end-of-
                    depot to maintain lower safety stocks. The inventory model   chapter application case
                    calculates the safety stocks and feeds it to the MC Network
                    Flow model. The MC Network Flow model is the core of the   The empty container problem is faced by most shipping
                    ECO  system.  It  provides  information  for  optimal  decisions   companies. The problem is partly caused by an imbalance
                    to be made regarding inventory levels, container reposition-  in the demand of empty containers between different geo-
                    ing flows, and the leasing and return of empty containers.   graphic areas. CSAV used an optimization system to solve
                    The objective function is to minimize empty container logis-  the empty container problem. The case demonstrates a situ-
                    tics cost, which is mostly a result of leasing, repositioning,   ation where a business problem is solved not just by one
                      storage, loading, and discharge operations.    method or model, but by a combination of different opera-
                                                                     tions research and analytics methods. For instance, we realize
                                                                     that the optimization model used by CSAV consisted of differ-
                    results/benefits
                                                                     ent submodels such as the forecasting and inventory models.
                    The ECO system activities in all regional centers are well coor-  The shipping industry is only one sector among a myriad of
                    dinated while still maintaining flexibility and creativity in their   sectors where optimization models are used to decrease the
                    operations. The system resulted in a 50 percent reduction   cost of business operations. The lessons learned in this case
                    in inventory stock. The generation of intelligent information   could be explored in other domains such as manufacturing
                    from historical transactional data helped increase efficiency   and supply chain.
                    of operation. For instance, the empty time per container cycle
                    decreased from a high of 47.2 days in 2009 to only 27.3 days   Source:  R.  Epstein  et  al.,  “A  Strategic  Empty  Container  Logistics
                    the following year, resulting in an increase of 60 percent of   Optimization in a Major Shipping Company,” Interfaces, Vol. 42, No.
                    the average empty container turnover. Also, container cycles   1, January–February 2012, pp. 5–16.



                    References

                    Allan, N., R. Frame, and I. Turney. (2003). “Trust and Narrative:   Baker, J., and M. Cameron. (1996, September). “The Effects of
                      Experiences  of  Sustainability.”  The Corporate Citizen,    the Service Environment on Affect and Consumer Perception
                      Vol. 3, No. 2.                                    of  Waiting  Time:  An  Integrative  Review  and  Research
                    Alter, S. L. (1980). Decision Support Systems: Current Practices   Propositions.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,
                      and Continuing Challenges. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.  Vol. 24, pp. 338–349.








           M02_SHAR9209_10_PIE_C02.indd   105                                                                     1/25/14   7:45 AM
   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111