Page 224 - Caldera Volcanism Analysis, Modelling and Response
P. 224

Characterisation of Archean Subaqueous Calderas in Canada             199


             4.3.2. Volcaniclastic lithofacies and iron-formation lithofacies
             The volcaniclastic and iron-formation lithofacies is 2–20–m-thick and composed
             of 2–50 cm-thick tuff–lapilli tuff (Figure 3C). The tuff–lapilli tuffs are graded T a
             (S 3 -beds of Lowe, 1982), T ab , T abc , T ad and T abcde beds that are consistent with
             high- and low-concentration density current deposition. Rip-up clasts of chert and
             jasper are common. Pyroclast constituents include felsic shards, wispy vitric and
             angular lithic volcanic fragments, pumice and broken and euhedral crystals, which
             collectively argue for a pyroclastic deposit (Fisher and Schmincke, 1984), although
             they could be syneruptive with limited reworking. The black T d of the tuff
             turbidites and the T e mudstone represent a felsic vitric ash component (e.g. Fritz
             and Vanko, 1992) and background sedimentation that settled through the water
             column, respectively (Figure 3A). Synvolcanic faults with fluid movement
             (Figure 3E), water escape structures, and small-scale load casts are well preserved.
             The iron-carbonate horizons alternate with chert, which is either silicified tuff or
             diagenetically recrystallised and compacted shard-rich tuff. Even the iron-formations
             have been locally silicified, indicating numerous stages of hydrothermal alteration.


             4.3.3. Mafic dykes and sills
             Numerous sills and dykes intrude the upper formational stage. Tholeiitic columnar-
             jointed dykes intruded N-trending, synvolcanic faults and fractures, with
             hydrothermal black and white chert as well as laminated jasper deposited
             along brecciated dyke margins (Figure 3F). The gabbro sills have a well-defined
             subophitic texture and are massive or columnar-jointed. Columnar-jointed sills
             were emplaced high in the sequence, where abundant seawater may have percolated
             to cause rapid cooling and vesiculation due to devolatisation. In addition, aphanitic
             basalt and dacite bodies intrude at a shallow angle subparallel to bedding. These sills
             acted as local barriers for hydrothermal fluid movement, which resulted in sulphide
             precipitation at the volcaniclastic sediment–sill interface.


             4.4. Evolution of hunter mine caldera
             The subaqueous HMC has a polyphase history (Figure 5A–E), in which a caldera,
             dominated by effusive felsic volcanism evolved over ca. 6 m.y. The distribution of
             lithofacies and synvolcanic faults, if only at the small scale, suggest either a piston or
             incipient piecemeal caldera. The first caldera-forming event (lower formational
             stage, Figure 5A, B) exhibits both incremental fragmentation of the caldera floor
             into horst and graben structures and the development of a caldera margin along a
             major ring fault. Early reverse and subsequent normal faults formed and facilitated
             subsidence. Volcanism was dominated by thick dome-flow-hyaloclastite complexes
             and some of the vesicular clast-rich breccias may have a low-energy explosive
             (frothing) component, caused by devolatisation and violent water–magma
             interaction. Energetic fountains driven by rapid devolitisation of magma developed
             locally under deep-water hydrostatic pressures (Mueller and White, 1992). A period
             of felsic quiescence ensued as major tholeiitic sills intruded high in the sequence.
             The Roquemaure sill (Figure 5C) of the middle formational stage attests to a phase
   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229