Page 181 - Carbon Nanotube Fibres and Yarns
P. 181

172   Carbon Nanotube Fibers and Yarns


              4 3    y =4.3148x+ 0.103       4                        6 5
             Conductivity (×10 4  S/m)  2 1  R =0.9571  Conductivity (×10 4  S/m)  3 2  Conductivity  4 3 2 Specific conductivity (×10 4  S•m/tex)
                       2
                                                          y=0.0035x+4.2412
                                                             2
                                                            R =0.0529


              0                              1 0         Specific conductivity  1 0
               0  0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9  0  10  20  30  40  50  60
           (A)        Yarn density (g/cm ) 3  (B)     Twist angle (degrees)

              8 7                            8 7
             Conductivity (×10 4  S/m)  6 5 4 3 2  Twisted  Specific conductivity  (×10 4  S.m/tex)  6 5 4 3  Twisted








              0 1            False-twisted   2 1 0       False-twisted
               0    5   10   15   20   25      0   5    10   15   20   25
            (C)    Twist/false-twist  (×10  T/m)  (D)  Twist/false-twist  (×10  T/m)
                               3
                                                                3
          Fig. 7.23  Effect of yarn density on electrical conductivity (A) and effect of twist on spe-
          cific conductivity (B) of CNT yarns dry-spun from forest, based on the data from Ref. [27].
          Effect of twist and false twist on conductivity (C) and specific conductivity (D) of CNT
          yarns dry spun from forest, based on data from Ref. [6]. (Sources of (A and B): M. Miao,
          Electrical conductivity of pure carbon nanotube yarns, Carbon 49 (12) (2011) 3755–3761.
          Sources of (C and D): M. Miao, The role of twist in dry spun carbon nanotube yarns, Carbon
          96 (2016) 819–826.)


             Similarly, the specific conductivity of rubbing densified CNT yarns is not
          significantly affected by the rubbing conditions used in yarn production [29].
             Table 7.3 compares the electrical conductivity of CNT fibers and yarns
          produced by different methods. Unfortunately, many authors do not provide
          specific conductivity or yarn density, so we cannot normalize the values for easy
          comparison. Generally speaking, yarns dry-spun from MWNT forests show
          similar conductivity and the differences between the values reported by differ-
          ent research groups could be largely explained by the difference in yarn density.
          Yarns directly spun from a furnace using the floating catalyst method have con-
          ductivity about one order of magnitude higher than those dry-spun from for-
          ests, mainly because the floating catalyst method produces mostly  double-walled
          carbon nanotubes (DWNT) or a mixture of SWNTs and MWNTs. The
            solution-spun yarns show a wide range of electrical conductivity as a result of
          the different types of CNTs used, from metallic to semiconducting.
   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186