Page 179 - Carbon Nanotube Fibres and Yarns
P. 179

170   Carbon Nanotube Fibers and Yarns


          7.4  Electrical conductivity
          Single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) may be either metallic or semi-
          conducting depending on their chirality, i.e., how a single-layer graphene is
          wrapped into a cylinder (nanotube). The electrical resistivity through the same
          graphene layer in a MWNT is much lower than that between the coaxial layers
          (between walls) [3]. Resistivity in MWNTs can also be reduced by subjecting
          the CNTs to annealing [72] and by controlled defect creation that promotes
          cross-shell bridging. Contact resistance between nanotubes depends strongly
          on the atomic structure in the contact area and can vary by more than an or-
          der of magnitude. The optimal electronic transport between nanotubes occurs
          when the tubes are in atomic scale registry where atoms from one tube are
          placed on top of another [73]. Resistivity of CNT bundles formed in synthesis
          can vary greatly due to large differences in the structures of nanotubes and the
          electrical testing methods used. The electrical conductivity of MWNT-based
          macrostructures is generally lower than that of defect-free individual CNTs
          due to the presence of amorphous carbon and other impurities, which cause
          scattering and increase contact resistances [74, 75].
             Chen et al. [76] reported the dependence of electrical conductivity of
          random and aligned CNT films on nanotube structure (wall number and
          diameter). The random films were made by dispersing CNT forest (500–
          600 μm in length) in an organic solvent while the aligned films were pro-
          duced by laying a CNT forest using a roller-press method. The two types
          of films showed similar conductivity and reached a peak when the average
          wall number was 2.7, corresponding to an average nanotube diameter of
          5.4 nm. The appearance of the peak was attributed to the off-setting effects
          of increasing nanotube conductivity and decreasing CNT packing density
          of the films with the increase of nanotube wall number.
             Aliev et  al.  [77] measured the temperature dependence of resistivity
          in different CNT assemblies including yarns (Fig. 7.22). Unlike the pos-
          itive coefficient typically observed in metallic materials, all the MWNT
          assemblies showed a negative temperature coefficient of resistance (dR/
          dT < 0), indicating their semiconducting characteristics. They proposed that
          although the longer overlap of aligned MWNTs could not greatly reduce
          the number of barriers to electron hopping process, alignment substantially
          reduced the electron pathway and the electrical resistivity.
             Typical values of room temperature electrical conductivity for CNT
                                                 4
                                                             4
          yarns spun from forests are between 1.5 × 10  and 4.1 × 10  S/m [5, 13, 27,
          78–80]. A major reason for this wide spread of value is the difference in yarn
   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184