Page 125 - Carbon Nanotubes
P. 125

Properties of buckytubes  and derivatives             115
          tronic properties are close to those of a graphite plane.   The above discussion ignores all paramagnetic ef-
          The study of electron energy loss spectra (EELS) sup-   fects including band paramagnetism.  Evidence for a
           ports this model[19]. We can identify three relevant   Curie-like contribution is seen at low temperatures in
           energy scales. First, the quantizing effect of the cylin-   some of the curves displayed in Fig. 5 and could arise,
           drical geometry involves an energy AE = h2/2mR2 =  in part, from paramagnetic impurities (see below).
           0.7  x lop2 eV.  Second, there is the Fermi energy Ei,   The anisotropic susceptibility of buckytubes is gov-
           which is 1.2 x  lop2 eV. Third, there is the thermal en-   erned  by  various  geometrical and structural  factors
           ergy, which at room temperature (the highest temper-   (such as the aspect ratio and degree of perfection of
           ature studied) is about 2.5 x   eV. We see that all  its  structure).  In the  direction  perpendicular  to the
          three of these energy scales are of the same order. If   buckybundle axis, we do not expect xi to be larger
          we consider a higher temperature,  where the carriers   than 0.5 x:.   However, in the direction parallel to the
          are Boltzmann particles (with a small inelastic mean   buckybundle axis x:  might be much larger for a high-
           free path  !,)>  and  the magnetic  field  (-tesla)  is  a  quality sample of buckytubes,  as discussed above. The
           small perturbation on the particle motion, the mag-  measured  anisotropy  factor  in  this  work  (approxi-
          neric  susceptibility would  be due to small quantum  mately  1.1 at room temperature and increasing with
          corrections to the energy of the system. For this quasi-   falling temperature) likely represents a value smaller
          classical  case., the quantizing action of the geometry   than that achievable with a highly ordered structure.
          is not important; the response of the system to the per-   The small value may be caused by imperfectly aligned
          turbation may be considered as a sum over small pla-   buckytubes in the buckybundle.
           quettes of the size I,.  (This additivity is hidden by the   The magnetic susceptibility  data for buckytubes,
          effect of a non-gauge-invariant formalism[35]; never-   amorphous graphite,  crystalline graphite,  the gray-
          theless, it is a general physical  property,  and the in-  shell material, and C,,  as a function of temperatures
          elastic mean  free path is the correlation radius of  a  are shown in Fig. 5. Paramagnetic upturns were ob-
           local magnetization.) Therefore, at high temperatures   served  (for all of  the curves)  at temperatures  lower
           a  buckytube  with  R  > I,  may  be  considered  as  a  than 10 K. Amorphous graphite and C,,  show no ob-
           rolied-up graphitic sheet (or concentric tubes). We use   servable  temperature  dependence  at  temperatures
          this model to calculate the susceptibility, xk, for the  ranging  from 10 K to 300 K, whereas the buckytube
           field perpendicular to the buckybundle axis. We write   sample exhibits a large increase in diamagnetic suscep-
          the susceptibility tensor of  single crystal graphite as   tibility with falling temperature.
                                                        A plot of xpl vs  T for C6, was used to estimate a
                                                      Curie  constant  of  8.6  x  lO-’/mole,  which  corre-
                                                      sponds to 1.7 x lo-* electron spins per carbon atom
                                                      in C,,.  It is possible that the paramagnetic upturn is
                                                      caused by a small amount of  0, within the sample.
                                                      To examine this point, we sealed a Cs0 sample under
                                                      a vacuum of 2 x  lo-’  Torr in a chamber located at
           To obtain the magnetic susceptibility of a buckytube
           for the magnetic field perpendicular to the buckybun-
           dle axis, xk, we have to average the magnetic energy
           E = 0.5 xjJ H, Hj over the cylindrical geometry of the
           buckytube (over a plane containing the a and c axes):
             dE = 0.5[~& H2 cos2 a + (6 H2 sin2 a] da   (2)

           or

              E  = O.5H2[x& cos2 a + x& sin2 a] da

                = 0.5H2(0.5x& + 0.5xk);          (3)
           Thus




           Because x& = 41x&, this argument predicts
                                                                   Temperature  (K)
                          xg  0.5~;              (5)
                                                      Fig.  5.  Temperature dependence of the magnetic suscepti-
                                                      bilities measured in a magnetic field of 2 T: (a) C,,  powder,
           This is consistent with our experimental results, which   (b) polycrystalline graphite anode, (c) gray-shell material, (d)
           strongly Suggest the existence of delocalized   buckybundle: axis perpendicular to H, and (e) buckybundle:
           Discussion of (L  can be found in reference[36].         axis parallel to H.
   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130