Page 128 - Carbon Nanotubes
P. 128

11s                                X. K. WANG et al.






























                   Fig. 9.  Photographs of the cross-section of the deposited rods; photos (a) and (b) were taken from deposited
                        rods produced by the glow discharge and by the conventional arc discharge, respectively.



             note that the average diameter of the bundles decreases  at the center of the deposited rod and the temperature
             towards the perimeter of the deposited rod. The clad-  decreases towards the perimeter  because the heat  is
             ding shell around the rod is composed of fused gra-  transported by both radiation and conduction via the
             phitic flakes. The geometry and the distribution of the   He gas.  In the cladding  shell area, the temperature
             bundles in the deposited rod may be interpreted as fol-  may not be high enough to form the bundles but is
             lows. In the glow mode, the highest temperature occurs  sufficient to form fused graphitic materials. Although
                                                        several groups  have speculated  on the effect  of  the
                                                        electric  field  in  the  formation  of  buckytubes[ 13-
                                                        16,471, the influence of the temperature on the yield
                                                        and distribution of the bundles has not been discussed.
                                                        From our results, we may conclude that the tempera-
                                                        ture  is  one of  the  key  factors  in  the  formation of
                                                        buckybundles.
                                                           Figure 11 shows two typical TEM images for the
                                                        deposited rods synthesized in the glow mode and the
                                                        conventional arc mode, respectively. Two samples for
                                                        TEM observation were prepared in an identical way.
                                                        The figures  show the dramatic improvement in the
                                                        yield and quality of buckytubes synthesized in the glow
                                                        mode.  The buckytubes  and their  bundles  shown  in
                                                        Fig.  11 (a) are thicker and longer than that shown in
                                                        Fig.  11 (b).  The length  of  the  tubes  shown  here  is
                                                        larger than the field of view  of HREM used in this
                                                        study. Our systematic studies indicated that the yield
                                                        of the tubes made by the glow discharge is at least 20
                                                        times larger than that of the tubes made by the arc dis-
                                                        charge. In the arc mode, the jumping of the arc causes
                                                        an instability of the electric field which leads to a clo-
                                                        sure of the tube tips, so as to minimize dangling bonds
                                                        and lower the total energy.  Therefore,  the conven-
                                                        tional  arc discharge  produces  a  low  yield  of  low-
             Fig.  10.  A  SEM  micrograph  of  the  cross-section  of  the   quality buckytubes.
             deposited rod synthesized by the glow discharge shows an im-   Note also that  a  large  number  of  the  tube  tips,
             age of  1/4  of the cross-section of the deposited rod; upper
             left corner of the image corresponds to the center of the end   shown in Fig.  11 (b), are closed by caps that are po-
                          of the deposited rod.         lygonal  or  cone-shaped.  Iijima  has  found  that  the
   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133