Page 129 - Carbonate Sedimentology and Sequence Stratigraphy
P. 129

120                                      WOLFGANG SCHLAGER


       A quantitative flow model by H. Kooi (Vrije Univ. Ams-   Another mechanism of stress increase has gained support
       terdam) indicates that under these circumstances, platform from recent studies of carbonate slopes - added stress by
       rocks are very unlikely to preserve significant overpressures sediment loading. Spence and Tucker (1997) rightly point
       during sea-level falls. Efficient flushing of the Pleistocene  out that in detrital sediments at the angle of repose stress
       platform rocks of the Bahamas is confirmed by the observa- will not increase by addition of sediment. The situation is
       tion that borehole Unda, 10 km inboard of the platform mar-  different, however, for in-situ growth of rigid bodies such as
       gin, presently is charged with well-mixed seawater down to  reefs or bodies of automicrite (see chapter 2). Several au-
       about 200 m (Swart et al., 2001).                     thors have observed that substantial volumes of automicrite
         Slope deposits of Great Bahama Bank present a some-  in the form of layers, lenses or mounds have been added
       what different picture. They have permeabilities of > 100  to the slopes of the T and M factories by in-situ precipita-
       millidarcy separated by cemented layers of 0.01 millidarcy  tion (Playford, 1980; Brandner et al., 1991; Blendinger, 1994;
       or less (Kenter et al., 2001; Melim et al., 2001). This configu-  Wood, 1999; Blendinger, 2001; Keim and Schlager, 2001).
       ration offers possibilities for preserving overpressure if the  These bodies are rigid upon formation and represent lo-
       tight layers are extensive and laterally continuous, some-  calized loads that may be capable of triggering slides and
       thing that is not known at present. Local sealing potential  slumps (Fig. 7.19). The common occurrence of automicrite
       of deeper-water carbonates was recently confirmed by ex-  and marine cement in megabreccia boulders certainly sug-
       tremely low permeabilities measured on North-Sea chalks  gests a connection.
       (Mallon et al., 2005). However, it is also well established that  In summary, the evaluation of processes that can trig-
       the same chalks generally are in hydrostatic equilibrium in  ger large slides, slumps and debris flows does not, at this
       the upper 1,000 m or more of the rock column (Scholle et al.,  point, provide convincing arguments for sea-level falls as
       1983, p. 619).                                        the prime driver of megabreccia formation. Without further
                                                             information, megabreccias should not be considered as in-
                                                             dicative of a particular sea-level position. Whether there is a
       Stress increase in the rock fabric. Spence and Tucker (1997)
                                                             specific connection in a particular instance, needs to be de-
       propose that stress increase by loss of buoyancy during sea-
                                                             termined in a case study. Ineson and Surlyk (2000) have con-
       level falls may lead to slope failure at the platform margins.  tributed an important example of this kind. Based on strong
       This is a distinct possibility. Whether it is a common phe-  circumstantial evidence the megabreccias of their Cambrian
       nomenon remains to be seen. The large number of near-  example were associated with highstands and lowstands
       vertical sea cliffs in Quaternary limestones suggests that in  but the largest and most extensive ones occurred during
       many instances meteoric lithification strengthens the rock  lowstands.
       faster than the increase of apparent weight by sea-level fall
       can crush it.

             A)                                      0 m
                                                                            Fig. 7.18.— Possible setting of confined, over-
                                                                          pressured aquifers during lowstands of sea level.
                                                                          A) Margin of rimmed platform experiencing sea-
                                                    -100 m
                                                                          level cycles of 100 m amplitude. B) Situation of a
                                                                          confined aquifer on the slope, e.g. a layer of sand
                                                                          sealed by a layer of cemented mud. Hydraulic gra-
                                                                          dient is the difference in hydraulic head divided
                                                                          by the horizontal distance. Hydraulic gradient in
             B)                                                           a sealed aquifer is created by sea-level fall and
                                                                          dissipated by leakage across the seal. Sketch ap-
                                                                          proximates the situation after the last interglacial-
                                                                          to-glacial transition. The process makes high de-
                                     pressure                             mands on continuity and quality of the seal. See
                                       gauge
                                                                          text for discussion.
                      hydraulic gradient

                             leakage
                                         hydraulic head
                                         from highstand

                                                   lowstand sea level


                                                    seal
                                                    aquifer
   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134