Page 66 - Carbonate Sedimentology and Sequence Stratigraphy
P. 66

CHAPTER 4: CARBONATE FACIES MODELS                                      57


           rived from the siliciclastic beach-shelf model. All one needs  FACIES BELTS OF THE T FACTORY
           to do is insert a wave-resistant rim (composed of reefs or
           partly lithified sand shoals) and adjust the facies for the ef-
                                                                    The succession of facies on rimmed tropical platforms has
           fects of this rim.
             The morphologic transition from ramp to rimmed plat-  been cast into a standard facies model by Wilson (1975). The
                                                                  model, based on two decades of case studies by numerous
           form is characterized by a gradual increase in slope and
                                                                  researchers, has passed the test of time. It has become a
           an accentuation of the platform margin. It has been ob-
                                                                  widely accepted framework for presentation of carbonate fa-
           served in seismic data (e.g. Sheriff, 1988, Fig. 1; Harris and
                                                                  cies (e.g. Tucker and Wrigth, 1990; Wright and Burchette,
           Saller, 1999,p. 40), in correlated boreholes (e.g. Burchette
                                                                  1996; Flügel, 2004) and is reproduced in Fig.4.3. Despite
           and Wright, 1992, Fig. 10) and in outcrops (e.g. Stanton and
           Flügel, 1989; Kerans and Tinker, 1999). The observational  the remarkable success of the model, some modifications are
           data do not constrain the transition in all details but some  called for. They are shown in Fig. 4.4 and discussed below.
           general trends emerge.                                   The standard model is “overcomplete”. It contains more
             It seems that the formation of a rim normally starts at the  facies belts than one normally finds on any one platform.
           inner ramp in one of two ways: (1) growth of patch reefs that  Platforms with a reduced number of facies belts may be per-
           form in the inner ramp seaward of the nearshore sand and  fectly normal and healthy. In the clinoform and fondoform
           subsequently coalesce to a shore-parallel belt; (2) the high-  settings, facies 2 (deep shelf) will only be present in addi-
           energy shoal itself becomes an quasi-stationary barrier by  tion to facies 1 if the platform has recently backstepped or
           high sediment production and syndepositional lithification.  has been structurally deformed. If a deep shelf exists, the
           Both reefs and sand shoals are likely to produce more sedi-  structure of the lithospere virtually dictates that it be con-
           ment than they can store, they therefore fill the lagoon and  nected with the deep basin floor of facies 1 by a slope. In
           then prograde seaward. As the crest remains a sea level but  epeiric seas, the facies succession may terminate with facies
           the ramp surface dips basinward, a slope gradually forms  2. In the undaform setting, the rim need not consist of facies
           and its declivity increases with increasing height (Fig. 3.8). 5 plus 6. Many healthy platforms have either facies 5 (reefs)
           When should we call this prograding system a rimmed plat- or facies 6 (sand shoals) as a rim.
           form? If the geometry is well preserved and slope angles  In one instance, the Wilson model lacks a facies belt. Fa-
           well measurable, such as in many seismic data, I recom-  cies 9 of Wilson (1975) was defined for arid settings only.
                                                         ◦
           mend drawing the boundary at approximately 1.5 .Sys-   However, the equivalent deposits in humid climates have
           tems with a barrier belt and a foreslope distinctly greater been described and are added here as facies "9-humid". It
                  ◦
           than 1.5 should be called rimmed platforms (see chapter should be noted that facies 9-arid and 9-humid are alterna-
           3). If slope angles are not available, facies may serve as a tives that will not occur side by side in one shore-to-basin
           proxy for morphology. On rimmed platforms, the rim belt  succession.
           should be reasonably continuous (rim index of ≥ 0.25) and  Another characteristic of the Wilson model is that it uses a
           its seaward slope should show evidence of slumping or of  discrete horizontal scale with sharp boundaries between fa-
           bypassing by sediment gravity flows, as indicated by gullies  cies. In nature, these facies boundaries may be gradational
           or canyons, increase in thickness and abundance of debrites and irregular. For instance, the subdivision of slopes in fa-
           and turbidites at the toe of slope etc.                cies 3and 4is often impossible and acombinedbelt 3/ 4 may
             In the climax stage of platform evolution, the wave- be more appropriate. The boundary between facies 7 and 8
           resistant rim sits at the platform edge, directly atop the  is oftenverygradual. Inthese instancesitispreferable to
           slope. This position is rather stable because of the dynam- designate a combined facies belt 7/ 8 and express increasing
           ics of platform growth: a rim that originally forms in a more restriction by biotic indices or a larger number of subfacies.
           bankward position will rapidly prograde if it produces more  The standard model says nothing about windward-lee-
           sediment than is needed to match relative sea-level rise; ward differentiation. Most platforms develop asymmetries
           such excess production is likely considering the high pro-  in response to dominant wind directions (Fig. 4.9 and chap-
           ductivity of rims. At the platform edge, the rate of progra- ter 7). Seismic surveys reveal these asymmetries better than
           dation slows down because the high slope requires much most other techniques.
           larger sediment volumes for the same amount of prograda-
           tion (Fig. 3.9). Thus, further progradation will be slower but
                                                                            Discription of the standard facies belts
           the slope will tend to steepen to the angle of repose because
           of the high sediment supply from the productive rim. On  1A) Deep Sea.  Setting: Below wave base and below
           the platform side, the rim sheds excess sediment ranging in  euphotic zone; part of deep sea, i.e. reaching through the
           size from clay to boulder. Beyond the reach of rim debris,  thermocline into the realm of oceanic deep water. Sedi-
           an open lagoon may develop with a bottom profile in equi-  ments: Entire suite of deep-sea sediments such as pelagic
           librium with wave action. However, at the climax stage of  clay, siliceous and carbonate ooze, hemipelagic muds
           platform evolution, this lagoon is largely filled and replaced  including turbidites; adjacent to platforms we find mixtures
           by tidal flats that expand seaward almost to the platform  of pelagic and platform-derived materials in the form
           rim.                                                   of peri-platform oozes and muds. Biota: Predominantly
   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71