Page 342 - Chemical Process Equipment - Selection and Design
P. 342

306  SOLID-LIQUID  SEPARATION
                 TABLE 11.2.  Equipment Selection on the Basis of Rate of   The resistance R is made up of  those of  the filter cloth Rf and that
                           Cake Buildup                             of  the cake R, which may be assumed proportional to the weight of
                                                                    the cake. Accordingly,
                                 Rate of
                  Process Type   Cake Buildup   Suitable Equipment
                                                                                                                (11.2)
                Rapid          0.1-10  cm/sec  gravity pans; horizontal belt or
                  filtering                top feed drum; continuous   E= specific resistance of  the cake (m/kg),
                                           pusher type centrifuge
                Medium         0.1-10  cm/min  vacuum drum or disk or pan or   c = wt of  solids/volume of liquid (kg/m’),
                  filtering                belt; peeler type centrifuge   p = viscosity (N sec/m2)
                Slow          0.1-10  cm/hr   pressure filters; disc and tubular   P = pressure difference (N/m2)
                  filtering                centrifuges; sedimenting
                                           centrifuges                 A = filtering surface (m’)
                Clarification   negligible   cartridges; precoat drums; filter   v = volume of  filtrate (m’)
                                 cake      aid systems; sand deep bed   Q = rate of  filtrate accumulation (m’/sec).
                                           filters
                    (Tiller and Crump, 1977; Flood, Parker, and Rennie, 1966).   Rf and  E  are constants of  the  equipment and slurry and must be
                                                                    evaluated from experimental data. The simplest data to analyze are
                                                                    those  obtained  from  constant  pressure  or  constant  rate  tests  for
                                                                    which  the  equations will be  developed. At  constant pressure Eq.
                                                                    (11.2) is integrated as
                 pure  water  to  displace  the  residual  filtrate.  Qualitative  cost
                 comparisons also  are  shown in  this  table.  Similar comparisons of
                                                                                   [YC
                 filtering and sedimentation types of  centrifuges are in Table 11.19.   = RfV + - V2           (11.3)
                    Final  selection  of  filtering equipment  is  inadvisable without   P   2A
                 some testing in the laboratory and pilot plant. A few details of  such
                 work are mentioned later in this chapter. Figure 11.2 is an outline   and is recast into linear form as
                 of  a  procedure  for  the  selection  of  filter  types  on  the  basis  of
                 appropriate  test  work.  Vendors  need  a  certain  amount  of  in-                           (11.4)
                 formation  before  they  can  specify  and  price  equipment;  typical
                 inquiry forms are in Appendix C. Briefly, the desirable information
                 includes the following.                            The constants Rf and  E  are derivable from the intercept and slope
                                                                    of the plot of  t/V against V. Example 11.1 does this. If the constant
                 1. Flowsketch of  the process of  which  the filtration is  a part,  with   pressure period sets in when t = to and V = V,, Eq. (11.4) becomes
                   the expected qualities and quantities of  the filtrate and cake.
                 2.  Properties of  the feed: amounts, size distribution, densities and                         (11.5)
                   chemical analyses.
                 3.  Laboratory observations of sedimentation and leaf filtering rates.
                 4.  Pretreatment options that may be used.         A plot of  the left hand side against V + V, should be linear
                 5.  Washing and blowing requirements.                 At constant rate of  filtration, Eq. (11.2) can be written
                 6.  Materials of construction.
                                                                       e=-=      AAP                            (11.6)
                                                                           V
                    A major aspect of  an SLS process may be conditioning of  the   t  p(Rf + acV/A)
                 slurry to  improve its filterability. Table  11.4 summarizes common
                 pretreatment  techniques,  and  Table  11.5  lists  a  number  of   and rearranged into the linear form
                 flocculants and their  applications. Some discussion of  pretreatment
                 is in Section 11.3.                                   _-_=_  ’Rf+7V.                           (11.7)
                                                                                     PEC
                                                                        Q  -V/t  A   A
                 11.2.  THEORY  OF  FILTRATION
                                                                    The constants again are found from the intercept and slope of  the
                 Filterability  of  slurries  depends  so  markedly  on  small  and   linear plot of  AP/Q against V.
                 unidentified dserences in conditions of formation and aging that no   After  the constants have been  determined,  Eq.  (11.7) can be
                 correlations of  this behavior have been made. In fact, the situation   employed  to  predict  filtration  performance  under  a  variety  of
                 is so  discouraging that  some practitioners  have dismissed existing   constant rate  conditions. For  instance, the slurry may be  charged
                 filtration  theory  as  virtually  worthless  for  representing  filtration   with a centrifugal pump with a known characteristic curve of output
                 behavior.  Qualitatively,  however,  simple  filtration  theory  is   pressure against flow rate. Such curves often may be represented by
                 directionally  valid  for  modest  scale-up  and  it  may  provide  a   parabolic relations, as in Example 11.2, where the data are fitted by
                 structure  on  which  more  complete  theory  and  data  can  be   an equation of  the form
                 assembled in the future.
                    As filtration proceeds, a porous cake of  solid particles is built   P  =U - Q(b + cQ).     (11.8)
                 up on a porous medium, usually a supported cloth. Because of  the
                 fineness of the pores the flow of liquid is laminar so it is represented   The  time  required  for  a  specified amount  of  filtrate is  found  by
                 by the equation                                    integration of

                    e=-=- AAP                                           t = [ dVlQ.                             (11.9)
                        dV
                        dt   pR  ’                           (11.1)
   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347