Page 41 - Chinese Woman Living and Working
P. 41

28 DAVID S.G.GOODMAN
            differences in the proportion of wives of the new rich with the same birthplace as their
            husbands were presumably  a function of  social mobility. Managers of state sector
            enterprises usually have a career pattern that sees them move away from home at an early
            age, with the opportunities often denied others to meet spouses from another location. 18
              As Table 1.3 indicates, while the wives of the new rich were generally less educated
            than their husbands, from the perspective  of the  distribution of  the highest level  of
            education achieved, the difference was certainly not great. Fewer wives had graduated
            from university, but the numbers of husbands and wives who had participated in higher
            education of all kinds was roughly equal. In the case of private-sector entrepreneurs, the
            proportion of wives who were graduates from higher education (university and college
            combined) was actually higher than that of their husbands.
              The educational link, and particularly  at  an  early  age, is clearly important  for
            understanding some of the dynamics of husband and wife interaction in the new economy.
            Table 1.5 lists husbands and wives who first met through being in class together in the
            formal system of education. Almost half of the new rich couples had first met this way.
            Remarkably, almost four in every ten couples had first met in kindergarten. Given the
            high proportion of couples who, as already noted, had married within their county, this
            might have been an expected consequence of the emergence of enterprises in the rural
            collective and private sectors of the economy, where development was fuelled by a rhetoric
            of  local identification and  motivation  (Goodman 2003). However,  the proportion of
            couples who met in kindergarten was not low in any category of the new rich.
              Table 1.6 provides information on the workplace of the wives of the new rich, and
            Table 1.7 on the occupation of the wives of the new rich and cadres, as revealed through
            the interviews with their husbands. As Table 1.6 indicates, almost half of all wives and
            husbands worked together in the same enterprise. Necessarily, there were different
            proportions of husbands and wives in the same workplace across the different categories
            of the new rich. In the private sector, owner-operators and their wives almost always
            worked together; elsewhere  the proportion was  more usually four in every ten. The
            exception was the urban collective sector where only one in five couples worked in the
            same enterprise.
              As the information presented in Table 1.7 suggests, wives were often employed as
            accountants and bookkeepers,  not only,  as already noted,  in  the running of family
            concerns in the private  sector but also in other types  of enterprise. Because  of their
            interchangeable usage in contemporary Shanxi, and mostly elsewhere in China (though it
            would seem that this started to change somewhat during the late 1990s), no distinction
            has been made between ‘bookkeeper’ and ‘accountant’.
              The notion that the wives of the new rich were ‘non-working’ is flatly contradicted by
            Table 1.7. Not only were a quarter of the wives of the new rich employed as bookkeepers
            and accountants, but goodly proportions were  also  employed as teachers and  cadres.
            Altogether, professional or white-collar work accounted for 67 per cent of the occupations
            of the wives of the new rich. The number of wives who were teachers are distributed
            across all categories of the new rich, but those who were cadres were largely wives of
            managers of state sector enterprises, reinforcing the role of that kind of enterprise as socially
            a part of the party-state, even when reformed (Steinfeld 1998). Indeed, regardless of their
   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46