Page 29 -
P. 29

where λ defines if the patent is licensed (licensed = 1, unlicensed = 0), b is the y-axis
                   intercept, and the k’s are constants.  We observe significant differences in the signals of
                   these patent populations—calculated results and stylized representations of the data for
                   signal and aggregator Web hits results are presented (Figure 9C and 9D, respectively).
                   While both scale linearly with patent citations, licensed patents receive more signal Web
                   hits per citation than unlicensed patents.  Licensed patents also appear to accumulate
                   aggregator Web hits to a greater degree per citation than unlicensed patents.  This
                   acceleration of accumulating Web hits in licensed patents may allow this measure to
                   appear more quickly than citations because of the delay in patent issuance [42], thus
                   representing a harbinger of technical importance.


                   Scholars use patent citation analysis to retrospectively assess the patent record to
                   understand modes of collaboration, analogous to the work done in this study.  However,
                   this Web presence indicator may allow innovators, scholars, and research managers to
                   obtain more dynamic and real-time intelligence regarding the commercial value of
                   patents.  For example, two unique patents—one commercially used and the other not—
                   are indiscernible in terms of vintage and number of citations but can exhibit significantly
                   different Web presence signatures.  Since the mechanics of Web presence accumulation
                   are materially different from those underlying citations, this novel measure provides new
                   information on the value of a patent.  Populations of licensed and unlicensed patents are
                   known to be different given the ex post information about whether they have generated
                   commercial interest, and we demonstrate that the populations exhibit different signatures
                   in the aggregator and signal Web hits that are statistically different.  The differences in
                   the signal Web hits are the expected differences in the commercial impact of the patents
                   while the aggregator Web hits are likely an amplified measure of the technical impact of
                   the patents, typically measured by citations.  With further refinement, aggregator Web
                   hits may be able to mirror analysis that currently uses citations to predict technical
                   impact, while adding signal Web hits as a measure of commercial importance.
                   Combination of these metrics may allow for easier and faster assessment of patent
                   impact.  While this measure is noisy and requires refinement, these preliminary data
                   indicate that Web presence analysis may be able to help determine or predict commercial
                   value of patents as distinguished from technical merit.

                   In an attempt to extend these observations that signal Web hits are a measure of
                   commercial importance, we performed the same Poisson regressions using signal hits that
                   we performed on the patent citations to test differences between the factors producing
                   commercially relevant, rather than technically relevant, innovations.

                   3.3  Breakthrough Sources
                   Technology importance (citation based) and commercial importance (Web presence
                   based) findings are summarized by technology in the following sections.  Effect sizes are
                   expressed in terms of absolute citation or Web hit count differences, and we report both
                   observed and simulated variance of like patents.  Observed mean values for the patent
                   group of interest (b) are compared against all available control groups (a) for the contrast
                   variable of interest.  We report all significant findings (regressed or simulated p < 0.1);
                   greater coefficient size and agreement between the two statistical methods indicates
                   increased certainty.  For each reported effect, there is an unreported significant finding in



                                                             22
   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34