Page 112 - Communication Processes Volume 3 Communication Culture and Confrontation
P. 112

The Indian Legal System  87

                due to the fact that a national legal system was established and certain
                uniformity was sought. However, some jurisdictions were left to the
                states. This means that some of them have been more progressive in
                terms of women’s rights. For example, Maharashtra has more equal
                succession rights for widows. Indeed, like Kerala and Andhra Pradesh,
                Maharashtra has given Hindu widows the right to inherit both acquired
                and ancestral property, while in the rest of India only property acquired
                during the lifetime of the husband is included under the Hindu Suc-
                cession Act of 1956 (Agarwal 1994). Therefore, women’s access to
                property differs throughout India.



                Women’s Property Rights and Land Reforms

                In spite of the importance of property, property rights are still a ne-
                glected aspect of Indian legislation, as was the case under the British.
                When subject to law, it is in terms of succession rights. Land issues are
                the most important ones concerning property rights of women, espe-
                cially widows. On an individual level, widows owning land and living
                with their sons are more respected within their community compared
                to the ones who do not possess land (ibid.; Drèze 1990). However,
                legislators faced difficulties integrating the ideal of the equality of the
                sexes in land reforms.
                  Diverse forms of irrigation, adapted to various types of soil, charac-
                terize contemporary India. In addition, there is also a variety of local
                land systems and therefore land reforms after independence varied
                between states. There were a series of Land Reform Acts, but because
                there was a presumption that the male head of household was the
                titleholder, such reforms seldom took gender issues into consideration.
                Consequently, access to property for women varies from one state to
                another.
                  Two decades ago the issue of independent property rights for women
                was not admissible in public political discourses in South Asia (Agarwal
                1994: 2). Despite a long evolution of land reforms, a lot remains to be
                done in order to enforce the rights of women. One explanation is the
                differences between central government policies and their enforcement
                by state governments (ibid.: 9). There are no data on the proportion of
                land possessed by women in India. However, ethnographic research
   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117