Page 31 - Communication Processes Volume 3 Communication Culture and Confrontation
P. 31

6  Editors

                  ruling class and, as the principal subordinate class, the working
                  class. (Bennett et al. 1986: xiv)
                  The idea of hegemony does not suggest that domination is achieved
                  by manipulating the worldview of the masses. Rather; it argues that
                  in order for cultural leadership to be achieved, the dominant group
                  has to engage in negotiations with opposing groups, classes, and
                  values—and that these negotiations must result in some genuine
                  accommodation. That is, hegemony is not maintained through the
                  obliteration of the opposition but through the articulation of oppos-
                  ing interests into the political affiliations of the hegemonic group.
                  (Turner 1990: 211–12)

                  Simple and straight oppositions dissolve, while mobile and pro-
                visional combinations deriving from different class locations shape
                cultural confrontations. The outcome is a mix of imposition, subordi-
                nation, opposition, spontaneity and enforcement in multiple permuta-
                tions and unsteady proportions (Bennett et al. 1986: xv–xvi).



                Practices of Counter-culture

                Some cultures play counter-cultural roles at a certain period of time in
                a given cultural milieu when particular sections depart from the norms,
                codes or values hitherto received by the majority of others. This may
                be observed among social sections whose voices are usually repressed
                in any field (music, literature, narratives, performing arts, community
                festivals, philosophy, etc.), or more generally whatever the field or the
                idiom (music, poetry, social action, symbolic or ideological production,
                deviant behaviour, alternative conducts, etc.). The concept of ‘alter-
                native communication’ carries in this regard a will to emancipation
                from the control of the communication industry and established
                symbolic systems of social assimilation. But should the idea be simply
                equated with ‘non-dominant’ and interventionist attempts of emancipa-
                tion from the control of the communication industry? Should ‘counter-
                culture’ be necessarily construed as a culture of ‘resistance’?
                  The term ‘alternative communication’ is used by Vibodh Parthasarathi
                in his essay ‘Interventionist Tendencies in Popular Culture’, with
                reference to ‘media processes arising from and associated with counter-
                cultural politics’. It might be extended to any sort of contest leading
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36