Page 235 - Communication Theory and Research
P. 235

McQuail(EJC)-3281-17.qxd  8/16/2005  12:01 PM  Page 220











                         17                   News Production in



                                              Contemporary Russia:

                                              Practices of Power


                                               Olessia K oltso v a




                         Key problems in the studies of post-Communist media


                         Why study power practices in Russian news production? Although the issue
                         of media control both before and after the collapse of the Soviet Union has gen-
                         erated a large body of literature, it has usually had a single focus. What has
                                                                          1
                         mostly attracted the attention of scholars from the ‘West’ is the question of the
                          development of press freedom (or, as one of my western colleagues put it more
                          succinctly, ‘does Russian government still pressure the media?’).
                           This question is important, but the way it is asked indicates at least three west-
                          ern clichés about the post-Communist media (often borrowed by ‘eastern’ schol-
                          ars who tend to ascribe to western research a higher symbolic status). First, in
                          many cases these media are (implicitly) examined through the prism of traditional
                          normative discourse of press freedom, although other approaches have been suc-
                                                                            2
                          cessfully applied both to western and ‘Third World’ media. Second, applied to
                          post-Communist media, ‘freedom’ usually means freedom from government con-
                          trol, though obviously there exist other ways of conceptualizing freedom and
                          power, as is illustrated in some detail later in the article.
                           Third, such statements as the one about the Russian government ‘still pressur-
                          ing the media’ betray the existence of a common though usually silent assump-
                          tion that western governments have ceased to do so. Colin Sparks (Sparks and
                          Reading, 1998) is one of the few scholars who also points out the existence of
                          similar assumptions. He reproaches his colleagues for permanent, explicit and
                          implicit comparisons of fully manipulated ‘Communist’ media with an idealized
                          system of western ‘free’ media, that itself has hardly ever existed in reality.
                           However, in a non-comparative perspective many western scholars often crit-
                          icize domestic media. For example, while straightforward pressure and open
                          conflict are not widely known in the West, analysis of media content has made
                          the existence of influence apparent (Herman and Chomsky, 1988). This has given
                          the scholars a ground to conclude that explicit exercise of power by the US gov-
                          ernment must be substituted by mechanisms of domination. Thus (in general) a
                          wide range of power relations in western news production has been studied
                          with a variety of approaches drawing a polyphonic picture of multiform social
                          influences experienced by media-makers.

                         Source: EJC (1998), vol. 16, no. 3: 315–335.
   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240