Page 232 - Communication and Citizenship Journalism and the Public Sphere
P. 232

A TYRANNY OF INTIMACY?  221

            femininity. The  high number of anchor-women in Dutch television
            news might tell audiences that the public sphere, of which the news is a
            constituent part, is no longer a male preserve, but an appropriate place
            for women to reside too.
              The Dutch case is not that simple, however. In the context of recent
            changes in Dutch television  news, the dominance of women
            newsreaders presents another scenario. The increased number of female
            newsreaders runs parallel with an ‘intimization’ of the Journaal, among
            other things recognizable in its modes of address. I will describe those
            changes below and argue that the dominance of women newsreaders can
            also be seen as yet another articulation of traditional femininity.


                   THE INTIMIZATION OF DUTCH TELEVISION
                                      NEWS
            Dutch television news has undergone numerous changes since it was
            first broadcast in 1956. The first bulletin looked more or less like the
            newsreels shown in movie theatres. It went on air only three times a
            week at 8 p.m. Due to technical limitations and personal preferences the
            focus was on  human interest stories and  ritual functions  of news,
            labelled as ‘story  journalism’ by Schudson (1978). Newsreaders
            appeared infrequently in that period, usually only  by necessity when
            images  to visualize events were  not available.  They  were thought to
            hamper the objective character of the news.


              If a newsreader were seen while giving the news, any change in
              his visual manner, a smile or a lift of an eyebrow might, however
              little this was intended, be  interpreted as comment. The  sacred
              dividing line between fact and comment would be blurred.
                                                   (Holland 1987:146)
            Although newsreaders appeared ever more frequently on the screen, the
            uninvolved and detached mode of reading the news remained common
            practice until the mid-1970s. Personal traits and peculiarities were de-
            emphasized. As one TV critic ironically put it:

              In the first place a newsreader, be it a woman or a man, must not
              be too attractive, and—although this is less relevant—not too bad
              looking either. Of course it is strictly prohibited to read bad news
              in any  other way than good news. Objectivity would  be
              endangered by it.
   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237