Page 236 - Communication and Citizenship Journalism and the Public Sphere
P. 236

A TYRANNY OF INTIMACY?  225

            another expression of traditional femininity, but there is a remarkable
            difference as to what element of femininity is exploited. As we have
            said, the number of women newsreaders increased when editorial policy
            led the Journaal to cover more ‘human’ aspects of the news. The former
            executive  producer Brusse, whose arrival accelerated this trend,
            explicitly called this the ‘women’s touch’ in the news. ‘Men’s news is
            to write on the front page that a fire happened, women’s news is to write
            inside why the guy lit a fire for the third time’ (Journalist, November
            1986). During his brief period as editor, Brusse continually questioned
            the  rationalistic underpinnings  of the  Journaal and emphasized  the
            entertainment value and emotional qualities of news:

              One tear on TV  tells you  so much more than an ever so well
              described tear in the newspaper. Television made us communicate
              and participate in world affairs with tears. A Journaal without a
              tear is not a real Journaal and that has to be learned.
                                                  (Elsevier, May 1988)

            In  Brusse’s ideal Journaal,  newsreaders are assumed to provide the
            audience  with a stable point of  identification with the news  as  a
            programme  among the flow  of competing TV  programmes. The
            newsreaders are  assumed to establish  an  intimate and  personal
            relationship with the audience of their particular bulletin. ‘Audiences
            must be able to identify with the people who tell them the news. They
            must derive a sense of stability from them’ (Volkskrant, 1 November
            1986). Assigning  the same team of anchors to each news bulletin
            guarantees that  audiences know who  to expect  and who to relate to.
            Consider—as a short  sidestep—the  common practice in  most other
            European countries, where usually ‘different individuals will read on
            different days so that the public does not come to associate the news
            with a single source’ (Morse 1986:58).
              Thus the common conception of the anchor as the authoritative, wise
            and all-knowing (male) neighbour who guides you through a complex
            and confusing world does not seem very appropriate for the Dutch TV
            news. A comparison with the caring and never failing mother who tucks
            you in every night after a day of emotional arousal, seems more to the
            point. This characterization is underlined by the deliberately plain and
            ordinary  appearances of the anchor-women. Once, one of the more
            popular women newsreaders was asked in a newspaper editorial:
   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241