Page 48 - Communication and Citizenship Journalism and the Public Sphere
P. 48

RETHINKING THE MEDIA AS A PUBLIC SPHERE 37

            as a consequence, dominant interests have been forced to make political
            concessions, build cross-class alliances and modify their legitimating
            rhetoric in order to shore up their position.
              In  many liberal democracies, an  equivalent process  of coalition
            building has  occurred in ‘opposition’  to the dominant alliance.
            Subordinate interests have sought alternative ways of making sense of
            society; found  common ground with other  interests in a  similar
            predicament; combined forces and formulated a programme of reform
            as a basis for seeking wider support; and, very exceptionally, projected
            a vision of an alternative society that challenged the legitimacy of the
            social order and provided the  basis for mobilizing a  broad-based
            constituency of opposition.
              This perspective has the effect of ‘repositioning’  the place of  the
            media in society. The media are assumed to be caught in an ideological
            crossfire rather than acting as a fully conscripted servant of the social
            order. By implication, the media have a greater potential to affect the
            outcome of social  contests since these are no longer viewed as
            inevitably unequal and one-sided. Underlying this reorientation is the
            belief that certain reforms such as a progressive tax system and a strong
            welfare programme, a  more  egalitarian education  system, co-
            determination at work, legal guarantees of women’s and union rights—
            which are dismissed from one perspective as minor concessions leaving
            the social system fundamentally unaltered—are important gains in their
            own right.
              This is not to adopt uncritically liberal pluralist arguments. The media
            systems in most  liberal democracies are not  representative. On the
            contrary, most  under-represent subordinate interests and are  canted
            more towards the right than their publics. This reflects the prevalence of
            capitalist  media ownership, and  consequent influence  on personnel
            recruitment and promotion, market distortions limiting real  choice,
            media dependence on powerful groups and institutions as news sources
            and  the unequal  distribution of  resources within society for  the
            articulation and generalization of  social interests. But the  radical
            democratic approach  believes that the  media can  be reorganized in a
            way that will make them more representative or progressive. One way
            in  which  this can be done  is to secure democratic  consent  for  their
            reform through the state.
   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53