Page 206 - Communication and the Evolution of Society
P. 206

183                        Legitimation  Problems  in  the  Modern  State

         identity.  Legitimations  serve  to  make  good  this  claim,  that  is,  to
         show  how  and  why  existing  (or  recommended)  institutions  are
         fit  to  employ  political  power  in  such  a  way  that  the  values  con-
         stitutive  for  the  identity  of  the  society  will  be  realized.  Whether
         legitimations  are  convincing,  whether  they  are  believed,  depends
         naturally  on  empirical  motives;  but  these  motives  are  not  formed
         independently  of  the  (formally  analyzable)  justificatory  force  of
         the  legitimations  themselves.  We  can  also  say  that  they  are  not
         independent  of  the  legitimation  potential,  of  the  grounds  or
         reasons,  that  can  be  mobilized.  What  are  accepted  as  reasons  and
         have  the  power  to  produce  consensus,  and  thereby  to  shape  mo-
         tives,  depends  on  the  /evel  of  justzfication  required  in  a  given
         situation.  Since  I  would  like  to  use  the  concept  of  legitimation
         in  a  reconstructive  manner,  I  shall  take  up  briefly  the  question
         of  the  internal  structure  of  justifications.



                                       II
         P.  von  Kielmannsegg  has  provided  clear  criticisms  of  Weberian
         types  of  legitimacy  and  proposed  that  we  understand  traditional-
         ism  and  charisma  as  states  that  every  legitimate  order  can  assume.
         We  can  distinguish  these  aspects  of  the  establishment  and  main-
         tenance  of  legitimate  power  from  the  forms  of  legitimate  power,
         the  types  of  domination.  Here  again  we  can  separate  the  /egiti-
         mating  grounds  from  the  institutionalizations  of  domination.
         Certain  systems  of  institutions  are  compatible  with  a  given  level
         of  justification;  others  are  not.
           I  cannot  characterize  the  historically  familiar  levels  of  justifica-
         tion  in  terms  of  their  formal  properties  (as  would  be  necessary) ;
         instead  I  shall  illustrate  them  with  a  few  allusions.  In  early
         civilizations  the  ruling  families  justified  themselves  with  the  help
         of  myths  of  origin.  Thus  the  pharoahs  represented  themselves
         first  as  gods—for  example,  as  the  god  Horus,  son  of  Osiris.  On
         this  level  narrative  grounds  are  sufficient,  viz.  mythological  stories.
         With  the  imperial  development  of  the  ancient  civilizations  the
         need  for  legitimation  grew;  now  not  only  the  person  of  the  ruler
         had  to  be  justified,  but  a  political  order  (against  which  the  ruler
         could  transgress  ).  This  end  was  served  by  cosmologically  grounded
   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211