Page 58 - Communication and the Evolution of Society
P. 58

35                         What  Is  Universal  Pragmatics?

           It  is  to  this  generative  power  that  J  trace  the  fact  that  a  speech
         act  can  succeed  (or  fail).  We  can  say  that  a  speech  act  succeeds
         if  a  relation  between  the  speaker  and  the  hearer  comes  to  pass—
         indeed  the  relation  intended  by  the  speaker—and  if  the  hearer  can
         understand  and  accept  the  content  uttered  by  the  speaker  in  the
         sense  indicated  (e.g.,  as  a  promise,  assertion,  suggestion,  and  so
         forth).  Thus  the  generative  power  consists  in  the  fact  that  the
         speaker,  in  performing  a  speech  act,  can  influence  the  hearer  in
         such  a  way  that  the  latter  can  take  up  an  interpersonal  relation
         with  him.®’  It  can,  of  course,  be  said  of  every  interaction,  and
         not  only  of  speech  actions,  that  it  establishes  an  interpersonal
         relation.  Whether  or  not  they  have  an  explicitly  linguistic  form,
         communicative  actions  are  related  to  a  context  of  action  norms
         and  values.  Without  the  normative  background  of  routines,  roles,
         forms  of  life—in  short,  conventions—the  individual  action  would
         remain  indeterminate.  All  communicative  actions  satisfy  or  violate
         normative  expectations  or  conventions.  Satisfying  a  convention
         in  acting  means  that  a  subject  capable  of  speaking  and  acting
         takes  up  an  interpersonal  relation  with  at  least  one  other  such
         subject.  Thus  the  establishment  of  an  interpersonal  relation  is  a
         criterion  that  is  not  selective  enough  for  our  purposes.  I  empha-
         sized  at  the  start  that  I  am  restricting  my  analysis  to  paradigmatic
         cases  Of  linguistically  explict  action  that  is  oriented  to  reaching
         understanding.  This  restriction  must  now  be  drawn  somewhat
         more  precisely.  In  doing  so,  we  can  begin  with  the  standard  ex-
         amples  from  which  speech-act  theory  was  developed.  The  follow-
         ing  are  typical  speech-act  forms:
                                                     2”?
                “To...        you  that...           .
                                                   }
                       {verb}             {sentence
                e.g.,  ‘I  (hereby)  promise  you  that  I  will  come  tomorrow.”
                                                             ”?
                “You  are...                   Lee           .
                              {verb}  [p.  part.   {sentence}
                                             ]
                e.g.,  “You  are  requested  to  stop  smoking.”

                “T...                  Lae       you  that...          .
                       {auxiliary  verb]   {verb}            {sentence }
                e.g.,  “I  can  assure  you  that  it  wasn’t  I.”
   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63