Page 176 - Communication Commerce and Power The Political Economy of America and the Direct Broadcast Satellite
P. 176

166           Communication,  Commerce and Power

           neighborhood.  Moreover,  if  the  DBS  subscriber  decides  to  stop
           receiving signals,  the reception unit can be removed and,  at minimal
           cost,  can  be  installed again at another location.  Moreover,  given  its
           continent-size coverage area, DBS systems, unlike most cable services,
           are  not  dependent  on  their  successful  deployment  in  pre-specified
           territories. If a DBS service fails  to 'catch on' in Canada or Florida,
           for example,  the  same  DBS  operator can shift his  or her marketing
           efforts  toward any number of alternate locations - perhaps  Mexico
           and California.  Cable, on the other hand, must succeed in pre-estab-
           lished markets. This extraordinary flexibility also enables DBS opera-
           tors  to  'poach'  from  cable  company  subscribers,  whereas  cable's
           capability to do the same to DBS is limited.
             All  of these  relative  advantages  are  largely  the  result  of cable's
           physical  limitations,  the fragmented  and localized character of most
           cable markets, and the fact that in North America DBS, in the 1990s,
           has  a relatively small  clientele from which cable can lure  away sub-
           scribers.  One study estimates that the cost per channel of reaching
                  14
           all  US  television  households  through  cable  is  $378  million,  whereas
           for  DBS  the  cost  is just $3.7  million.  15   Given  the size  of the North
           American market, the price for a DBS system essentially to 'wire' the
           continent works out to US $1.67 per household. 16
             After just one year in business, the most successful North American
           DBS  enterprise,  DirecTV,  had  1.3  million  household  subscribersY
           While  this  penetration  into  homes  probably  will  not  continue  far
           beyond  15  million  by  the  year  2000  - due  largely  to  the  efforts  of
           terrestrial-based systems to provide digital video technologies to their
           existing subscribers- it constitutes an unprecedented growth rate for
           any post-1945 in-home technology.  In Britain, as of 1996, after seven
           years  in  service,  5.5  million  households  receive  DBS  signals.  18   In
           Europe,  the  Astra system  (the  telesatellites  carrying  BSkyB  services
           and many others) was received by more than 65 million homes at the
           end of 1995, up from just over 20 million in 1990. 19  As the cutting-edge
           transnational  and  digital  communications  technology,  corporate  in-
           vestors  of  DBS  developments  now  include  practically  every  TNC
           directly  involved  in  information  and  communication  commodity
           activities, including AT&T. 20
             Until1994, the only operating DBS system in the United States was
           Primestar  - a  company  owned  by  a  partnership  of the  country's
           largest cable television companies. Originally called K-Prime Partners,
           its  participants  have  included  Comcast,  Continental,  Cox,  New
           Vision, 21   TCI,  United  Artists, 22   Viacom, 23   Warner  Cable  and  the
   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181