Page 171 - Communication Commerce and Power The Political Economy of America and the Direct Broadcast Satellite
P. 171

7  Capital, Technology and


               the United States in an

                'Open Market'  Regime






           United States domestic reforms have had anticipated and unanticip-
           ated  implications  for  the  international  political  economy.  For  ex-
           ample,  the  AT&T  settlement  was  largely  driven  by  the  desire  to
           create  a  more  competitive  US  telecommunications  market  that,  in
           tum,  theoretically  would  reduce  equipment  and  services  costs  for
           domestic  (primarily business)  customers.  With  the formation  of the
           RBOCs  and  the  ongoing  liberalization  of the  American  equipment
           market, the standardisation of hardware and software that had been
           imposed  by  AT&T's  market  dominance  was  replaced  by  a  state  of
           technological fragmentation. This, and the relative low cost and high
           quality  of equipment  produced  overseas,  generated  a  sharp  rise  in
           foreign imports.  Moreover, the opening up of this market compelled
           the increased involvement  of government  agencies  into  communica-
           tion policy, including more participation by officials from the Depart-
           ment of Justice, federal courts and by state government regulators.
             The  growing  number  and  diversity  of agents  participating in  the
           behavioral  and  structural  regulation  of domestic  developments,  in
           conjunction  with  the  growing  convergence  of foreign  and domestic
           communication activities, exacerbated concerns regarding the policy-
           leadership vacuum in Washington. This was a pressing issue due not
           only to the inroads that overseas manufacturers were making into the
           American  market  but,  more  generally,  its  seriousness  involved  the
           belief that a historic opportunity to exploit the most significant pro-
           spective growth  sector in  the US economy could well  remain unrea-
           lized.1  As Jane Bortnick reported to Congress in 1983,

             other  nations  have  been  able  to  capitalize  on  American
             innovations  to  develop  commercial  products with comparable  or
             higher  quality  and  value  without  a  heavy  investment  in  basic
             research  and  development.  At  the  same  time ...  actions  by
             foreign  governments  to  increase  regulatory  controls  on
             telecommunications  and  information  activities,  erect  protectionist

                                         161
   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176