Page 184 - Communication Commerce and Power The Political Economy of America and the Direct Broadcast Satellite
P. 184

174          Communication,  Commerce and Power

           through which digital services (including HDTV) could be introduced
           on  a  mass  scale. 46   All  in  all,  the  most  lucrative  long-term  pay-off
           involving  DBS  may  involve  its  application  in  efforts  to  establish
           international HDTV markets as  a means  of generating a  vast  range
           of spin-off hardware and software opportunities.
             Television  sets  produced  by  Dutch-based  company  Philips  and
           French-based Thomson (and their subsidiaries) together account for
           over one-third of the world TV monitor market and about two-thirds
           of the West European market. 47  In order, at the very least, to preserve
           this European market share relative to prospective Japanese and US
           HDTV equipment manufacturers,  Philips  and Thomson  pressed EC
           officials to impose on member states an independent European HDTV
           standard. In  1991  the European Commission responded and directed
           DBS  operators,  manufacturers  of  relatively  large-screen  television
           sets, DBS dish makers and cable television systems to institute a single
           transmission standard called D2-MAC.
             Remarkably, this decision was adopted without consultations with
           relevant  consumer  associations  nor  any  consideration  as  to  how
           broadcasters  and  viewers  were  to  pay  for  the  adaptation.  It soon
           became apparent that the MAC Directive was impractical. A number
           of modifications were made. 48  Commercial telesatellite systems,  such
           as Astra, were allowed to continue their transmissions using the PAL
           standard.  The D2-MAC standard would  be introduced over  a  five-
           year period through simulcasts with the financial assistance of an EC
           subsidy  of more  than  $500  million.  However,  some  of the  largest
           terrestrial  broadcasters in  Europe began  developing  advanced  PAL-
           compatible  systems  that  would  accommodate  standard  and  wide-
           screen  ('quasi-HDTV')  transmissions  without  exceeding  current
           terrestrial  bandwidth  allocations.  The  French  government,  in  the
           meantime, maintained that its broadcasters and telesatellite operators
           should use the domestic SECAM system.
             In the face of these developments, the European Union has shown
           itself  largely  incapable  of  redressing  the  concerns  of  competitive
           European corporate and national interests.  It now appears  that any
           successful  HDTV  system  must  be  capable  of receiving  D2-MAC,
           PAL-Plus and SECAM transmissions. Moreover, these various trans-
           mission standards will have to be encrypted and decoded involving the
           continent-wide coordination of billing facilities.  These developments
           will  require  extraordinary  private  sector  investments  and  levels  of
           cooperation. The EU, given its limited financial resources, is unlikely
           to provide for more than a fraction of these costs. Corporations and,
   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189