Page 214 - Communication Commerce and Power The Political Economy of America and the Direct Broadcast Satellite
P. 214

204          Communication,  Commerce and Power

           result of the institutionalization of a free-trade/free-flow information
           regime in the 1990s.



           8.3  HEGEMONY, CULTURE AND MEDIATORS OF THE
           INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY

           Assumptions regarding the strategic necessity of  formulating counter-
           hegemonic challenges at a global level, while correctly focusing on the
           role of cultural and intellectual capacities in redressing dominant neo-
           liberal 'common-sense' assumptions,  not only remains a more diffi-
                                          12
           cult task  than the mounting of a  Gramscian war of position at the
           national level, but for the foreseeable future it is of secondary import-
           ance given the findings  of the present study.  Because the state is the
           essential mediator of 'globalization,' challenges to the contemporary
           world order first depend on capabilities forged  at the national level.
           This is  not to deny  that transnational production and related activ-
           ities, for example, are in themselves substantive and influential. Nor is
           it to challenge the fact that such structures have been and are extra-
           ordinarily  important  in  relation  to  national  and  local  policies  and
           imaginations. It is important to recognize,  as does Leo Panitch,  that
           'movement-building  struggles  arise in conjunctures  that are ...  more
           than ever  determined  on a  world  basis.  Movements  in  one  country
           have  always  been  informed  and  inspired  by  movements  abroad.'
           However,  Panitch also  (accurately,  I  think) views  such global forces
           in the context of a strategic historical perspective:

             There  is  no  need  to  conjure  up out of this an  'international civil
             society'  to  install  a  'transnational democracy.'  Rather,  a  series of
             movements  will  likely  arise  that  will  be  exemplary  for  one
             another, even though national specificities will continue to prevail.
             Of  course,  one  hopes  that  these  movements  will  be,  as  far  as
             possible,  solidaristic  with  one  another,  even  though  international
             solidarity movements cannot be taken for alternatives, rather than
             as  critical  supplements,  to  the  struggles  that  must  take  place  on
             the terrain of each state.U

             To  focus  on  the  assumed  development  of  a  global  civil
           society,  mediated  by  transnational  communication  technologies  like
           DBS,  international  organizations,  institutions  and,  still  more
           abstractly,  international  regimes,  as  the  means  through  which  a
   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219