Page 221 - Communication Commerce and Power The Political Economy of America and the Direct Broadcast Satellite
P. 221

Conclusion                     211

           NOTES
                Personal interview with  Janice  Obuchowski,  Freedom Technologies,  3
                March 1994, Washington, DC.
            2   Frederick Williams, The New Telecommunications,  Infrastructure for the
                Information Age (New York:  Free Press,  1991) pp.  11-12.
            3   Interview with Eric Scheck.
            4   Herbert I. Schiller in  Preston et al.,  Hope  & Folly  (Minneapolis:  Uni-
                versity of Minnesota Press,  1989) p.  301.
            5   Robert Cox quoted in  Stephen Gill,  'Epistemology,  Ontology and the
                "Italian School",' in Stephen Gill (ed.), Gramsci,  Historical Materialism
                and International  Relations  (Cambridge:  Cambridge  University  Press,
                1993) p.  42  (emphases added).
            6   See Robert W.  Cox, 'The Global Political Economy and Social Choice,'
                in  Daniel  Drache and  Meric  S.  Gertler  (eds),  The  New  Era  of Global
                Competition,  State Policy and Market Power (Montreal and Kingston:
                MeGill-Queen's University Press,  1991) esp.  pp.  337 and  343.
            7   Robert  W.  Cox,  Production,  Power,  and  World  Order  (New  York:
                Columbia University Press,  1987) p. 2.
            8   Ibid.
            9   The role of the USTR in representing International Intellectual Property
                Alliance interests in US-China software disputes during the mid-1990s
                serves as a reminder that the American state will remain the core agent
                through which the conditions required for international capital to oper-
                ate will be policed and enforced. Suggestions that a diminution of state
                power has taken place as a result of internationalization processes also
                are  challenged  in  light  of the  negligible  independence  of the  foreign
                communication policy agenCies examined in this book. Conceptualizing
                a  reduction  of state autonomy has little meaning in relation  to  a state
                that has rarely,  if ever, enjoyed such autonomy.
           10   Robert  W.  Cox,  'Global  Perestroika,'  in  Ralph  Miliband  and  Leo
                Panitch (eds), Socialist Register 1992 (London: Merlin Press, 1992) p. 31.
           11   Leo Panitch, 'Globalisation and the State' in Ralph Miliband and Leo
                Panitch  (eds.),  Socialist  Register  1994  (London:  Merlin  Press,  1994),
                p.  87.
           12   Stephen Gill, 'Gramsci and Global Politics: Towards a Post-Hegemonic
                Research Agenda' in Stephen Gill (ed.), Gramsci, Historical Materialism
                and International  Relations  (Cambridge:  Cambridge  University  Press,
                1993) pp.  15-17.
           13   Leo Panitch, 'Globalization, States, and Left Strategies,' Social Justice,
                23 (1-2) (1996)  89.
           14   Esteve Morera, 'Gramsci and Democracy,' Canadian Journal of Political
                Science, XXIII (1) (March 1990) 24.
           15   Kelly Lee,  Global Telecommunications Regulation,  A  Political Economy
                Perspective (London: Pinter,  1996) pp.  166--7 and 174.
           16    David  Bross,  DBS:  Global  Marketplace  Analysis  (Potomac,  Md.:
                Phillips Publishing,  1991) p.  8.
           17   Edward W.  Ploman, 'National Needs in an International Communicat-
                ion Setting,' Transnational Data Report, VI (5) (July- August 1983) 277.
   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226