Page 199 - Comparing Media Systems THREE MODELS OF MEDIA AND POLITICS
P. 199

P1: GLB/IRK/kaa  P2: KAF
                          0521835356c06.xml  Hallin  0 521 83535 6  January 28, 2004  21:0






                                            The North/Central European Model

                                                                                20
                              and still less common among Swedish and U.S. journalists. In Belgium,
                                                                                  21
                              too, the roles of reporter and commentator tend to be fused. The con-
                              trast with Sweden suggests that in this sense Germany (like Belgium)
                              shades toward the Polarized Pluralist Model, something that would be
                              consistent with the historical pattern of polarized pluralism in Germany
                              and with the continuing centrality of political parties there. Schoenbach,
                              Stuerzebecher, and Schneider (1998) and Weischenberg, L¨ offelholz, and
                              Scholl (1998), on the other hand, reject this view, the latter main-
                              taining that “for economic, technological and educational reasons,
                              there has been a convergence in journalism in the Western Democratic
                              countries” (251).
                                In terms of content, Kindelman (1994) found in a study of the re-
                              porting of the 1990 German Bundestag election that the major German
                              newspapers did have clearly identifiable slants in their coverage of the
                              partiesandcandidates,andSchulz(1996)discussingKindelman’sresults,
                              points out that German television news broadcasts, though less clearly,
                              also had distinguishable political slants (see also Kepplinger, Brosius,
                              and Staab 1991; Hagen 1993). German papers, it might be added, do not
                              openly campaign for political parties during election campaigns. Even
                              the Bild differs from the British popular press in this respect, though it
                              is recognized as clearly a paper of the political right and has the most
                              explicit value judgments on political candidates of any German paper
                              (SemetkoandSchoenbach1994:53),itdoesnotopenlyproclaimitssym-
                                                                              ¨
                              pathies (its banner proclaims that it is “Unabh¨angig – Uberparteilich”–
                              “Independent – Non-Partisan”).
                                The existence of a significant degree of external pluralism in the
                              German media – and also in the Swedish, despite apparently strong pro-
                              fessional values of separation of news and commentary – is suggested
                              in research by Patterson and Donsbach (1993; also Donsbach, Wolling,
                              and von Blomberg 1996) in which journalists were asked to place both
                              parties and news organizations on the political spectrum from left to
                              right. The results for Germany and Sweden are shown in Figure 6.1. In
                              both of these countries, as also in Italy and Britain, they placed the news
                              media across a wide spectrum, with television broadcasters grouped
                              relatively close to the center, reflecting requirements of internal plural-
                              ism, while newspapers varied widely in their political tendencies. United
                              States journalists, by contrast, placed all the news organizations


                              20
                                This is consistent with Esser’s findings.
                              21
                                Els de Bens, personal communication.
                                                           181
   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204