Page 175 - Complementarity and Variational Inequalities in Electronics
P. 175

166  Complementarity and Variational Inequalities in Electronics


                           We may thus apply Theorem 14 with F(x) = Mx, ϕ =  , and V(x) = x to
                           conclude that the trivial stationary solution of (5.48) is stable in the sense of
                           Lyapunov.

                           5.4 INVARIANCE THEORY

                           Suppose that the assumptions of Theorem 11 hold together with condi-
                           tions (5.36), (5.42), and (5.43).For x 0 ∈ D(∂ϕ), we denote by γ(x 0 ) the orbit

                                              γ(x 0 ) ={x(τ;t 0 ,x 0 );τ ≥ t 0 },
                                                      n
                           where x(·;t 0 ,x 0 ) :[t 0 ,+∞) → R ,t  → x(t;t 0 ,x 0 ), denotes the unique solu-
                           tion of problem  (t 0 ,x 0 ,F,0,ϕ). We also denote by  (x 0 ) the limit set

                                           n
                               (x 0 ) ={z ∈ R :∃{τ i }⊂[t 0 ,+∞);τ i →+∞ and x(τ i ;t 0 ,x 0 ) → z}.
                           We say that a set D ⊂ D(∂ϕ) is invariant if

                                                x 0 ∈ D =⇒ γ(x 0 ) ⊂ D,

                           that is,
                                          x 0 ∈ D =⇒ (∀t ≥ t 0 ) : x(t;t 0 ,x 0 ) ∈ D.
                                                                       n
                                                                                     n
                           We denote by d(s,M) the distance from a point s ∈ R to a set M ⊂ R , that
                           is, d(s,M) = inf m∈M ||s − m||.
                           Remark 34. Let x 0 ∈ D(∂ϕ).
                            i) It is clear that
                                              γ(x 0 ) ⊂ D(∂ϕ), (x 0 ) ⊂ D(∂ϕ).

                           ii) It is easy to check that
                                                      (x 0 ) ⊂ γ(x 0 ).
                           iii) If γ(x 0 ) is bounded, then  (x 0 )  = ∅. Indeed, if γ(x 0 ) is bounded, then we
                                                                                         n
                             can find a sequence x(τ i ;t 0 ,x 0 )(τ i ≥ t 0 ) such that x(τ i ;t 0 ,x 0 ) → z ∈ R .
                             Therefore z ∈  (x 0 ).
                           iv) If γ(x 0 ) is bounded, then

                                                lim d(x(τ;t 0 ,x 0 ), (x 0 )) = 0.
                                              τ→+∞

                             Indeed, if we suppose the contrary, then we can find ε> 0 and {τ i }⊂
                             [t 0 ,+∞) such that τ i →+∞ and d(x(τ i ;t 0 ,x 0 ), (x 0 )) ≥ ε. The sequence
                             x(τ i ;t 0 ,x 0 ) is bounded, and along a subsequence, we may suppose that
   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180