Page 175 - Composition in Convergence The Impact of the New Media on Writing Assessment
P. 175

142          CHAPTER 6

           In a just,  fair,  and  equitable educational  structure,  writing  as-
        sessment  would  wait  until  every  student  is sufficiently wired  to
        computers   and instructors  were well-trained  in the  ways  of pre-
        senting  writing through technology.  But the K-college  educational
        structure is not just, fair, and equitable. At the university level, it is
        especially inhospitable to the humanities  in general and Composi-
        tion in particular. This wave of hostility continues as long as a cor-
        porate  mindset  permeates  university  missions  and  philosophies.
        Danling Fu, writing in Sunstein and Lovell's collection, The  Portfolio
        Standard  (2000),  observed,  "Education  suffers  because,  like  this
        country, it is caught  between  two value  systems:  the  democratic,
        human values system and the economic, marketing values system"
        (p. 114). Most who teach in writing  or in the humanities would  ar-
        gue that the nation's  colleges and universities are leaning more to-
        ward the economic, marketing values system in higher education.
        This trend directly  affects  the  blending of computers  and  writing
        assessment at the  university.
           One only has  to peruse articles  in  The Atlantic Monthly like  'The
        Kept University" by Eyal Press and Jennifer Washburn (March 2000)
        to recognize that what Cynthia  Selfe argued for in her 1997 presen-
        tation  probably  won't  happen  in  the  near  future.  Press  and
        Washburn (2000) reported that George Mason University (GMU), a
        state-funded  university  in  Virginia,  tightened  its  bonds  between
        campus and corporation to support the region's high-tech  industry.
        According to Press and Washburn's  story, Virginia Governor James
        S. Gilmore promised to increase GMU's state funding up to $25 mil-
        lion per year  provided  GMU strengthened  its connections  to north-
        ern  Virginia's  growing  high-tech  businesses (2000, pp.  39-54).  In
        response, GMU's president, Alan Merten, announced,  "We must  ac-
        cept that we have a new mandate, and a new reason for [universities]
        being  in  existence  ....  The  mandate  is  to  be  networked"  (Press &
        Washburn, 2000,   p. 51, brackets mine).
           Part  of Merten's  mandate  included that  all  students  were  to be
        "trained  to  pass  a  'technology  literacy'  test"  (Press  & Washburn,
        2000, p. 51). Presumably, GMU's technology literacy test would be
        administered by the campus' computer and information technology
        department,  as  Merten  eliminated  several degree programs  in  the
        humanities to accommodate this new university mandate. This cut-
        ting of programs occurred even though  1,700 students signed a peti-
        tion  of  protest  and  180  professors in  GMU's  College  of Arts  and
   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180