Page 206 - Composition in Convergence The Impact of the New Media on Writing Assessment
P. 206

REFERENCES           173

        Freire,  P. (1993).  The banking model of education. In  D. Bartholomae & A.
           Petrosky  (Eds.),  Ways  of Reading. Boston:  Bedford Books.
        Fu,  D.  (2000).  The  contested  "I": Portfolios  and  cultural values.  In  B. S.
           Sunstein& J. H. Lovell (Eds.), The portfolio  standard: How students show us
           what   they  know  and   are  able  to  do.  Portsmouth,  NH:
           Heinemann/Boynton-Cook.
        Fukuyama,  F. (1995). Trust:  The social virtues and  the  creation of  prosperity.
           New York: Free Press.
        Gilster, P. (1997). Digital literacy. Hoboken,  NJ:  Wiley.
        Gronlund,  N. (1998). How to make achievement tests and  assessments.  New
           York: Longman.
        Grossberg,  L., Wartella,  E., & Whitney,  D. C. (1998). MediaMaking.  Thou-
           sand Oaks, CA: Sage.
        Haas,  C.  (1996). Writing  technology:  Studies  on  the  materiality  of literacy.
           Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum  Associates.
        Habermas,  J.  (1991). The structural  transformation  of  the public sphere:  An
           inquiry  into a category  of  bourgois society.  Cambridge,  MA: MIT Press.
        Hart-Davidson, B., & Krause, S. D. (2004).  RE: The future  of computers  and
           writing:  A  multivocal  textumentary.  Computers  and  Composition,  21,
           147-160.
        Herrington,  A., & Moran,  C. (2001).  What happens  when  machines  read
           our  students'  writing?  College  English,  63(4).  Retrieved  from
           http://www.ncte.  org/pubs/journals/ce/articles/109744.html
        Hesse, D. (1999). Saving  a place for  essayistic  literacy.  In G. Hawisher  & C.
           Selfe  (Eds.), Passions, politics, and  21st  century technologies (pp.  34-48).
           Logan: Utah State University Press and  Urbana, IL: NCTE.
        Hillocks, G. (2002). The testing trap: How state  assessments control learning.
           New York: Teachers Press.
        Himley,  M.  (1991).  Shared  territory:  Understanding  children's  writing  as
           works.  New York: Oxford  University Press.
        Hopkins,  K. (1998). Educational and psychological  measurement and  evalua-
           tion  (8th ed.). New York: Allyn  & Bacon.
        Howard,  T. (1997). A rhetoric of electronic communities. Greenwich,  CT: Ablex.
        Huntley,  J., & Latchaw,  J. (1998). The seven Cs of interactive  design. In J. R.
           Galin  &  J.  Latchaw  (Eds.),  The dialogic classroom: Teachers  integrating
           computer  technology,  pedagogy,  and  research  (pp.  106-130). Urbana,  IL:
           National Council  of Teachers  of  English.
        Huot,  B., & Williamson,  M. (1993). Validating holistic scoring for  writing  as-
           sessment:  Theoretical  and  empirical foundations.  Cresskill,  NJ:  Hampton
           Press.
        Huot,  B. (1996). Computers  and assessment:  Understanding  two technolo-
           gies.  Computers  and  Composition, 13(2), 231-243.
        Huot,  B., & Williamson,  M. (1998). What differences the  differences make:
           Theoretical  and  epistemological  differences  in writing assessment prac-
           tice. In C. Farris & C. M. Anson (Eds.),  Under  construction: Working at  the
           intersections  of  composition theory,  research, and  practice.  Logan:  Utah
           State University Press.
        Huot, B. (2002). Re-articulating writing  assessment. Logan: Utah State Uni-
          versity  Press.
   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211