Page 51 - Composition in Convergence The Impact of the New Media on Writing Assessment
P. 51

18          CHAPTER 1

        technology. When a student is writing  in the public sphere of the sa-
        lon,  a student's  innermost  thoughts  (his or  her  subjectivity) move
        away from being exclusively  "I centered" and move toward develop-
        ing  a  greater  sense of how  others  think  about  similar  issues. This
        process helps many  students  gain empathy  and insight regarding a
        topic that  can be presented at  the  students'  level. Through  e-mail,
        chat,  or MOO exchanges, students  offer  private thoughts  and  ques-
        tion  not  only their  thoughts  but  the thoughts  of others  as well. In
        this process, critical reflection occurs, and students shape their views
        around  the  contexts  and  audiences  available  to  them.  Again,  the
        question  becomes, how  do writing  teachers  measure  this  type of
        critical  development  with  the  current  writing  assessment  tools
        available to them?

              THE EFFECTS OF     TECHNOLOGICAL CONVERGENCE
                         ON THE WRITING CLASSROOM

        Not only does convergence recast the presentation of course content
        and  classroom  dynamics  in  a  composition  class, convergence also
        changes what compositionists  teach as part of the writing  process.
        Writing for web space, hypertexts,  weblogs,  or MOOs, for  instance,
        requires teaching  faculty  to  include lessons on visual  rhetoric  and
        design  to  complete  specific  tasks.  Adding the  dimension  of  visual
        rhetoric generates another  layer of competency and complexity to a
        student's  work.  Aside from  the  more  common  understanding  of
        what  writing  is for  most  composition  courses—clarity and  coher-
        ence, for example—instructors need to add the aspects of "creativity,
        curiosity,  consideration,  and  consistency"  (Huntley  &  Latchaw,
         1998,  p.  108). As educational  assessment  specialists Joan  Huntley
        and Joan Latchaw noted, infusing the networked phases of the class-
        room  with  consideration—defined  by  the  authors  as  "collegial re-
        spect"  (1998,  p.  108)  for  students—imparts  a  very  different
        classroom  dynamic  for  assessment.  Rather than  construct  an  ad-
        versarial professor-student  relationship in the writing class, consid-
        eration  anticipates  a cooperative,  collaborative  spirit of learning  for
        both  the instructor  and the  students.
           From my own experience over these last several years of teaching
        writing  in different  computer-based  class environments,  it appears
        that technology  does reduce the  antagonistic  relationship  between
        instructor  and student.  This is in direct opposition  to the rising  an-
   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56