Page 73 - Composition in Convergence The Impact of the New Media on Writing Assessment
P. 73

40           CHAPTER 2

        is a process akin to evaluating an exit essay or portfolio. This is not a
        view I share. As I see the  situation,  technological convergence trans-
        forms the idea of what a text is in four distinct ways that affect writ-
        ing assessment:

           1. Interactively
           2. Graphically
           3. Perspectively
           4. Theoretically

           Theorists,  writing  scholars,  and  practitioners  over  the  last  de-
        cade  have  argued  successfully  that  e-texts  have  greater  inter-
        activity than their paper cousins. In response to this claim, many in
        Composition   Studies  nod  their  heads  in  agreement  or  cock  their
        heads  in  skepticism.  Few, though,  question  what  interactivity  is
        and  how  it  distinguishes  e-texts  from  conventional  paper  texts.
        Writing  specialists need to  more  carefully  (and critically)  under-
        stand the interactive capability of e-texts  so they can focus on how
        assessment should be modified for an age when students will com-
        pose regularly  in a digital format.
           Independent researcher Paul Gilster advanced a good, clear expla-
        nation  of interactivity  in his book Digital  Literacy  (1997). Whether
        one visits or authors  web sites, hypertexts, or MOOs, interactivity is
        what allows a reader or a writer  to  "influence the way a particular
        situation  is handled"  and  to  "choose your  own  path  through  the
        site"  (Gilster,  1997,  p.  138).  But,  as  Gilster  suggested  and
        compositionists  should  also  consider, interactivity  additionally  re-
        fers to the mental processes writers must possess to construct a net-
        worked document (1997, p.   139).
           In  electronic environments,  then,  writers  must  learn new  rhe-
        torical  strategies  and  techniques  (techne)  to  create  shorter,  often
        more  fragmented  but  still  interconnected  pieces  that  comprise a
        larger work. This process currently differs  greatly from how  most
        compositionists  recognize the  unfolding of the  writing  process in
        academic writing. To illustrate this point, here is a familiar example
        for most writing instructors. A 10- or 15-page student research pa-
        per is a fixed object. The student gathers her research in some man-
        ner, compiles it in a prescribed order, word processes it,  revises or
        edits a draft, and turns in a sheaf of paper. The instructor  may skim
        sections, focus  on  specific  subsections, or read other  sections with
   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78