Page 68 - Composition in Convergence The Impact of the New Media on Writing Assessment
P. 68

TRANSFORMING TEXTS          35

           These  textual  categories become central  for  our  understanding of
        how instructors' knowledge of writing assessment  corresponds  to the
        text and how any  given transformation  in the text  or in textual  pro-
        duction  changes the relation  between writing  assessment  and text.
           If we look first  at  the culturally  salient text,  the dominant  crite-
        rion for  its  success is that of how  significant the  text  is for  specific
        cultural  groups  as well as  for  society at  large. As Kress  (1994) ex-
        plained,  a  text's  cultural  salience depends on  how  well  a  piece of
        writing  speaks to the cultural and social histories that exist and how
        it  considers the  possible cultural  and  social  futures  to  come. The
        text's  importance  comes  not  from  aesthetic  or  skill  qualities  but
        from  how well the writer understands how his or her writing  fits in
        with the concerns of a particular  segment of society by adopting  the
        language and rhetorical practices of that group.  The culturally  sa-
        lient  text,  then,  corresponds quite  comfortably with  the  positions
        found in the social constructivist  view of writing  instruction.  In this
        composing theory,  a writer's  competence is assessed by how  satis-
        factorily  he or she grasps the  exigencies involved in an issue and by
        the  degree  to  which  the  student  writer  uses  language  directed
        toward  a particular  audience to respond to a set of stakes.
           Salience is not  a primary issue with the  second textual  category,
        although  the  culture and politics of an  era may  determine what  a
        dominant  group  finds beautiful or pleasing in a text.  The aestheti-
        cally  valued  or  valuable  text,  Kress  (1994)  suggested,  reflects  the
        merit that a group ascribes to a particular  writing style. The aesthet-
        ically  valued  text  category  meshes well with  Faigley,  Cherry, and
        Jolliffe's  description  of the  "literary  view  of  composing"  (1986,  p.
        13) reflected in some faculty members' approach to assessment. To-
        gether, these two positions propose a belief that there is an absolute
        sublime element in worthy texts, even in student texts, albeit it is an
        unteachable beauty—a grandness that readers must   experience and
        writers must  probe for through  the writing process.
           The mundane   text  is the  most  problem filled  for writing  assess-
        ment  and for theories of composing.  Yet the mundane  text plays  the
        greatest role in networked writing.  For these reasons, I will spend a
        greater  amount  of time  and  space  covering  this  textual  category
        compared with the other two.  Kress (1994) described mundane texts
        as those that "form the bedrock of social and  economic life"  (p. 38).
        The everyday forms of professional or occupational  writing  reflect
        mundane texts. From e-mail memos to Internet relay chat to interof-
   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73