Page 130 - Contemporary Cultural Theory 3rd edition
P. 130

ContCultural Theory Text Pages  4/4/03  1:42 PM  Page 121





                                Semiology: from structuralism to post-structuralism



                     POST-STRUCTURALISM: LACAN, DELEUZE AND GUATTARI

                     Jacques Lacan
                     We referred to Lacan in the previous chapter’s discussion of
                     Zizek. Like Barthes and Foucault, Lacan too had a structuralist
                     past: influenced, in turn, by Lévi-Strauss, Saussure and Jakobson,
                     he had used structural linguistics to recover what he saw as the
                     essential kernel of Freudian psychoanalysis. Hence his insistence
                     that ‘the unconscious is structured like a language’ (Lacan, 1977,
                     p. 20). Unlike Freud, Lacan came to see the unconscious not as a
                     key to understanding and thus curing the aberrations of the
                     conscious ego, but as an end in itself, the centre of our being.
                     Expelled from the International Psychoanalytic Association as a
                     result, he founded the École Freudienne in Paris, in 1964, and
                     from there presented the two series of lectures, subsequently
                     published as Écrits and The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-
                     Analysis, which formed the basis of his thinking. Lacan reversed
                     the Freudian conception of the subject’s trajectory: instead of a
                     pre-Oedipal subject self-present to its own unity and only later
                     ‘split’ by socialisation, he saw the subject as wholly constructed
                     through the child’s contact with the external world of people and
                     language. There is therefore no core of self or subjectivity prior
                     to the child’s insertion into the social. Moreover, Lacan saw
                     language itself as providing the key to understanding how
                     human subjectivity is constructed. Interestingly, he claimed that
                     this was already implied in Freud’s The Interpretation of Dreams
                     (Lacan, 1977a, p. 159).
                       As we noted in chapter 3, Lacan developed a tripartite model
                     of the pyscho-social world, comprising the Imaginary, the Real
                     and the Symbolic. During the infant stage, the child inhabits a
                     pre-linguistic, pre-Oedipal ‘Imaginary’ characterised by speech-
                     less identity between child, mother and world. During the
                     ‘mirror stage’, between the ages of six and eighteen months,
                     primordial symbolisation in the fort-da games of presence and
                     absence develops a sense of subjectivity in the infant and hence
                     also awareness of its being and of existence in general. The
                     subject is formed, therefore, by the insertion of the child’s awak-
                     ening consciousness into the symbolic system of language

                                                 121
   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135