Page 167 - Contemporary Cultural Theory 3rd edition
P. 167

ContCultural Theory Text Pages  4/4/03  1:42 PM  Page 158





                                      Contemporary Cultural Theory



                   underclass, its popularity among western urban youth amounts
                   to the ‘commodification of black rage’ (p. 88).
                      In an essay first published in 1990 in the journal October, West
                   heralded the arrival of a ‘new kind of cultural worker...assoc-
                   iated with a new politics of difference’. The new politics would
                   be distinguished by its rejection of ‘the monolithic and the homog-
                   enous in the name of diversity, multiplicity and heterogeneity’;
                   by its repudiation of the abstract, general and universal in favour
                   of the concrete, specific and particular; and by its aim ‘to histor-
                   icize, contextualize and pluralize’ (West, 1999a, p. 119). Here West
                   quite explicitly identified the movement towards difference in the
                   fields of race, gender and sexuality, and the ‘shattering of male,
                   WASP cultural homogeneity’ (p. 127), as running parallel with
                   and being fuelled by decolonisation and revolutionary national-
                   ism in the ‘Third World’. But these struggles had been at least as
                   much a matter of equality as of difference. Hence Klor de Alva’s
                   criticism that in self-identifying as racially ‘black’ or ethnically
                   ‘African-American’, West and other black intellectuals had
                   actually perpetuated a racialised discourse based on skin colour.
                   For Klor de Alva, himself a Chicano and an anthropologist, this
                   merely played into the hands of racism, trapping ‘blacks’ and
                   ‘other so-called people of color, in a social basement with no exit
                   ladder’. West’s response was to argue that a sense of group
                   identity based on skin colour is necessary for ‘protection, asso-
                   ciation and recognition’ (p. 501). Identifying as black had been
                   both positive and affirmative, he continued, arguing that it was
                   ‘important not to conflate overcoming racial barriers with
                   dismantling racial language’. The latter, West concluded, ‘ignores
                   or minimizes the history of racism’ (p. 509).
                      Like West, Henry Louis Gates, Jr, also worked at Harvard,
                   where he is Chair of the Afro-American Studies Department.
                   One of the leading voices in black literary and cultural studies
                   in the United States, his work is a mixture of cultural criticism,
                   literary theory and autobiographical disclosure. As with West,
                   much of Gates’ work has been a recovery of ‘black’ cultural
                   tradition and the collective African-American past from under
                   and inside the dominant white version of American history. In
                   Figures in Black and The Signifying Monkey, Gates investigated

                                               158
   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172