Page 75 - Contemporary Cultural Theory 3rd edition
P. 75

ContCultural Theory Text Pages  4/4/03  1:42 PM  Page 66





                                      Contemporary Cultural Theory



                   all of us...to direct our first sexual impulse towards our mother
                   and our first hatred and our first murderous wish against our
                   father’ (Freud, 1976, p. 364). This is the most fundamental of
                   repressed desires for both boys and girls, he argued, though it is
                   resolved differently in the two sexes. Eventually, the male child
                   is driven through fear of castration to identify with the authori-
                   tarian father figure, so that his desire for the mother effectively
                   disappears. Lacking a penis, the female child can never identify
                   so completely with the father and therefore redirects her desire
                   from mother to father. She nonetheless continues to suffer from
                   ‘penis envy’, which can only find resolution in giving birth to a
                   baby, as a replacement object for the initial constitutive lack. Later,
                   Freud famously reformulated this theory in terms of the tripar-
                   tite distinction between id, ego and super-ego, where the ego was
                   the self, the super-ego the social part of the self, and the id a new
                   term for what he had meant by the unconscious. The id, Freud
                   explained, ‘is the dark, inaccessible part of our personality ...we
                   call it chaos, a cauldron full of seething excitations...It is filled
                   with energy reaching it from the instincts, but it has no organi-
                   zation... only a striving to bring about the satisfaction of
                   instinctual needs . . . The id... knows no judgements of value: no
                   good and evil, no morality’ (Freud, 1973, pp. 105–7).
                      But what has all this to do with culture? The short answer is
                   everything, since culture is simultaneously the source of psychic
                   repression and fuelled by that repression. It thus becomes quite
                   fundamentally a matter of the regulation and control of desire.
                   In Totem and Taboo, Freud’s excursion into anthropology, he even
                   went so far as to argue that ‘the beginnings of religion, morals,
                   society and art converge in the Oedipus complex’ (Freud, 1985,
                   p. 219). In The Future of an Illusion, he identified two distinguishing
                   features of human civilisation: the control and exploitation of
                   nature and the rational organisation of relations among people.
                   The latter is achieved by coercion and the suppression of libid-
                   inal instincts. Human beings do not readily accept such social
                   control, since it requires so much in the way of instinctual renun-
                   ciation, but it remains necessary, to overcome the ‘destructive, and
                   therefore anti-social and anti-cultural, trends’ present ‘in all men’
                   (Freud, 1985a, p. 185). Historically, Freud observes, religion has

                                               66
   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80