Page 78 - Contemporary Cultural Theory 3rd edition
P. 78

ContCultural Theory Text Pages  4/4/03  1:42 PM  Page 69





                           Critical theory: from ideology critique to the sociology of culture



                     of reification. Human reality is necessarily detotalised under cap-
                     italism, he argued, both by commodity fetishism and by other
                     reified forms of consciousness, the most important of which is,
                     in fact, science (pp. 6–7).
                       For the young Lukács, reified thought could be overcome only
                     by the proletariat’s coming to consciousness of itself as the iden-
                     tical subject and object of history (p. 20). In the early 1920s Lukács
                     clearly viewed the prospects for such development as fairly
                     imminent: the ‘imputed’ class consciousness (p. 51) embodied in
                     Marxism was to be actualised in the empirical consciousness of
                     a working class led by the revolutionary party. But as Lukács
                     recoiled from both Nazism and Stalinism, this revolutionary
                     optimism gave way to an increasing reliance on the realist novel
                     as the principal totalising instance in our culture (Lukács, 1963).
                     While Anderson is mistaken seeing western Marxism as born from
                     a moment of failure (quite the contrary—it was born from a
                     moment of high revolutionary optimism)—it would eventually
                     be characterised by ‘a common and latent pessimism’ (Anderson,
                     1976, pp. 92, 88). Hence the preoccupation with how culture as
                     ideology functions to legitimate the capitalist system, and so too
                     the growing scepticism as to the possibilities for successful
                     working-class opposition.



                     Antonio Gramsci
                     Such pessimism is typically Weberian, but paradoxically it was
                     Gramsci, perhaps the western Marxist thinker least influenced by
                     Weber, who produced by far the most theoretically persuasive,
                     and indeed influential, Marxist theory of legitimation. As is well
                     known, Gramsci substituted, for the more orthodox base/super-
                     structure model, a civil society/political society model, which
                     derived from both Hegel and Marx, but which had commanded
                     relatively little attention among Marxists. Political society here
                     denoted the coercive elements within the wider social totality,
                     civil society the non-coercive. Where most Marxists had prev-
                     iously stressed politico-economic coercion, and where Weber had
                     stressed legitimation, Gramsci chose to point towards both, and
                     towards their inextricable interconnection in the maintenance of

                                                 69
   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83