Page 120 - Contemporary Political Sociology Globalization Politics and Power
P. 120

106  Social Movements


                        cultural frame in which they are situated any more than any other social
                        member. RMT, however, is based on a realist epistemology in which the
                        objects of study are, or have been, real resources and political structures
                        which exist independently of their meaningful construction by social
                        actors. The implications of adopting a framing theory of social action
                        which is incompatible with this realist epistemology have not yet been
                        fully considered within this tradition.
                            Finally, the cultural framing approach also has important implications
                        for the RMT view of politics. If social action is based on defi nitions and
                        meanings made from within cultural frames, then there is no reason to

                        see the contestation of definitions and meanings as simply a preliminary
                        to collective action, a mobilizing strategy to enable a social movement to
                        realize the real goals of influencing political structures and effecting socio -

                          economic change. On the contrary, the theory of framing suggests that
                        what is at stake in much collective action is cultural politics: the contesta-
                        tion and transformation of the meanings actors attribute to events, experi-
                        ences, and perceptions, and the attempt to construct and reconstruct one ’ s
                        view of oneself and others.
                            Traditionally, RMT has focused on social movements as political actors
                        concerned above all with achieving change to the socio - economic struc-
                        ture through the nation - state. It is important not to neglect the relation-
                        ship between social movements and the state, nor to ignore the fact that
                        integration into the political process in the way Tilly describes may  facili-
                        tate  the realization of a movement ’ s aims, rather than representing its
                        cooption and neutralization (as, for example, Touraine would see it).
                        However, this is very different from the understanding of politics which
                        is the consequence of RMT ’ s  “ cultural turn. ”  On this understanding, the
                        ongoing contestation of social identities and structures and the broader
                        social change effected as a result must also be seen as political. At this
                        point, the RMT tradition joins  “ new social movement ”  theory, to which
                        such an understanding of the cultural politics of social movements has
                        always been central.



                            3.2   New Social Movement Theory: Confl ict
                        and Culture

                          In contrast to the liberal premises of RMT, New Social Movement Theory
                        has its roots in Marxism, which it rejects but from which it, nevertheless,
                        retains certain presuppositions. It is based on the centrality of confl ict to
                        society and, rather than beginning from the starting point of isolated
   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125