Page 233 - Control Theory in Biomedical Engineering
P. 233

214   Control theory in biomedical engineering


          complete or useful acceptance of an electrically powered prosthesis. These
          patients experimented with a satisfactory combination of comfort, aes-
          thetics, and functional parameters. As a result, it was evident that this tech-
          nology might be better than body-powered prostheses.
             In terms of costs, externally powered prostheses can cost $25,000 to
          $75,000 (Resnik et al., 2012), which is 7.5 times more than a body-powered
          prosthesis. For this reason, 3D-printed electrical-powered prostheses con-
          trolled by electromyography (myoelectrical prostheses), in some cases by
          individual voice, or by electroencephalography (EEG) have been developed
          to reduce the cost of hardware and prototyping time.


          4.4 Myoelectric prostheses

          Before the development of externally powered prostheses, devices were
          commanded solely by buttons or switches in an open-loop control manner.
          However, it was not until the myoelectric prosthesis appeared that this
          approach changed. Myoelectric prostheses belong to the electrical-powered
          active prostheses spectrum with capability of reading the electromyographic
          (EMG) activity from the voluntary movements of muscles (Popov, 1965).
          This technology was developed by Reiter in the period 1944–1948
          (Weihe, 1998). He used vacuum tubes to create a myoelectric prosthesis
          but with huge dimensions. Consequently, his system did not gain clinical
          or commercial acceptance. It was until late 1960s that researchers around
          the world “re-invented” the technology with the help of the transistor
          and its application as an amplifier. The electromyography upper-limb wear-
          able device for amputees consisted of several elements to detect the user’s
          intention, trying to mimic the natural human movement, from electrodes
          for EMG detection, to signal processors and controllers, ending with
          actuators for prosthesis movements. Sensors established communication
          between human control signals and the upper-limb prostheses. Then, mod-
          ern prosthetic hands incorporated surface electrodes located on the skin sur-
          face to acquired myoelectric signals. These electrodes are preferred because
          noninvasive techniques are much easier to access. In conventional myo-
          prostheses (prostheses with electromyography techniques), two bipolar
          EMG-signals are placed on antagonistic muscle groups, such as the wrist
          extensors and flexors, and are used to control the velocity of one DOF
          (Mazumdar, 2004). However, there exist techniques to collect intramuscu-
          lar signals (Weir et al., 2009; Al-Ajam et al., 2013) with implantable myo-
          electric sensors. More recently, a surgical procedure known as Targeted
   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238