Page 379 - Control Theory in Biomedical Engineering
P. 379

Tunable stiffness using negative Poisson's ratio  345


              7.1.3 High-density foam
              As an alternative to silicon, we used another flexible material—high-density
              foam (Fig. 25). We theorized that the amorphous nature of foam would slow
              down the crack propagation and it could also be more easily stretched com-
              pared to rigid cardboard paper. The same testing process was carried out, and
              after the tests, we noticed a marked improvement in terms of the tearing of
              hinges. However, this material failed to stiffen through our theorized means.
              This is because even after closing the bulk gaps between each of the indi-
              vidual sections, there were still minute natural gaps within each section
              because of the nature of foam. Hence, the application of a load leads to huge
              deformities, so a pure foam-like material is not suited for such applications.
                 From these tests, we concluded that the perfect mix for such applications
              is a combination of rigid and flexible materials. The rotating squares must be
              stiff to bear load and exhibit stiffness characteristics when required. How-
              ever, the hinges connecting the different squares must be made from a flex-
              ible material to ease the stretching of the structure into its auxetic form. To
              meet these requirements, we could use a multimaterial design by using
              Vero-White as the rigid material for the squares and a mixture of Tango+
              with other materials to create an amorphous flexible material for the hinges.
              Furthermore, we could make design improvements by altering the hinge
              shapes. Instead of a straight cut hinge, which introduces a lot of stress
              concentration, we could use a curved cut to reduce the chance of tearing
              and improve repeatability. However, the use of multimaterial 3D printers
              would significantly increase the time and cost of fabrication, which goes





















              Fig. 25 (A) Nonrigid structure when the spaces are closed; (B) High-density foam
              auxetic behavior.
   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384