Page 382 - Control Theory in Biomedical Engineering
P. 382

348   Control theory in biomedical engineering


             This unit triangle requires three parameters to be characterized, which
          include the side a and the angles α and β. It follows that
                                       L AB ¼ a,                        (8)
                               L BC ¼ a  sin αðÞ=sin βðÞ,               (9)

                              L AC ¼ a  sin α + βÞ=sin β ðÞ:           (10)
                                          ð
             When in its folded state, the position of the same triangle is characterized
          by the height h and the angle of twist ϕ as well as the radius r of the cylinder.
          Again, it follows that
                                              π

                                    l AB ¼ 2rsin  ,                    (11)
                                              n
          where n is the number of repetitions of the unit cell. Since there are different
          folded states with different heights and twist angles, it is not possible to deter-
          mine them using the three constants, namely a, α, and β. Thus, there is a
          need to introduce strains E AB , E BC, E AC to link the variables to the constants,
          where

                                         l AB  L AB
                                    E AB ¼                             (12)
                                            L AB
          and so on. The deformation energy stored in one strip of the paper is then
          given by

                            nEA      2         2        2
                        U ¼      L AB E AB + L BC E BC + L AC E AC ,   (13)
                             2
          where EA is the tensile rigidity. This deformation energy shows that there
          are apparent bi-stable states where the fully extended as well as the fully col-
          lapsed states have minimum energy. There exists an energy barrier between
          these two states, which is evidence that once fully extended, the material is
          stiff and requires a higher amount of energy to collapse again. A more
          detailed derivation of the results can be found in Zhai et al. (2018). By vary-
          ing the angles α and β, it is possible to select the energy barrier and hence the
          stiffness change required for bespoke applications.
             While this method of using collapsible structures showed promise as a
          variable stiffness mechanism, it also had a major disadvantage with respect
          to actuation. As mentioned earlier in the section objectives, we aimed to
          create a combined actuation and variable stiffness method using a single
          structure. When tested for actuation capabilities, it was observed that the
          device was only able to collapse and extend and did not provide useful
   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387