Page 549 - Corrosion Engineering Principles and Practice
P. 549

512    C h a p t e r   1 2                                                                                                        C o r r o s i o n   a s   a   R i s k    513


                      spends  approximately  seven  billion  dollars  per  year  on  corrosion
                      control. This figure includes operations and maintenance activities,
                      capital expenditures, and corrosion failure repairs [18]. The tools most
                      commonly used by operators to verify pipeline integrity include both
                      external and internal direct assessments, hydrostatic testing, and in-
                      line inspection (ILI). Each of these tools can be used under various
                      circumstances for baseline assessments and future reassessments.

                      12.7.1  External Corrosion Damage Assessment
                      External  corrosion  direct  assessment  (ECDA)  is  a  structured  process
                      that  consists  of  four  key  steps:  preassessment,  indirect  examination,
                      direct examination, and post assessment (Fig. 12.16). ECDA is intended
                      to assist pipeline operators in establishing the integrity of pipelines. The
                      process uses aboveground cathodic protection (CP) survey methods,
                      many of which have been used in the pipeline industry for decades.
                      ECDA further defines the process, validation, and data integration for
                      these survey methods [18]. The ECDA process incorporates standard
                      techniques  for  compiling  historical  information,  pipeline  and  soil
                      surveys, external pipeline inspections, and data analyses.

                      Preassessment
                      Preassessment  is  the  first  step  in  the  ECDA  process. All  pertinent
                      historical information is compiled, falling generally into five categories
                      [19]:

                          •  Pipe data
                          •  Construction data

                           ECDA
                          process
                          overview

                          Step one
                           Integrity    Step two
                         preassessment   Indirect
                       Answers the questions:   inspection  Step three
                        Is ECDA possible?               Direct
                       Inspection tools to use?  Answers the questions:   examination  Step four
                                      Are there anomalies?
                                       ... and where?  Answers the questions:   Post
                                                  How serious are the anomalies?   assessment
                         Data collection          How good is indirect inspection?  Answers the questions:
                                                                  How good is the ECDA process?
                                      Conduct inspection
                        Indirect tool selection      Prioritize examination  How often should it be made?
                                      Identify anomalies              Remaining life
                        Define ECDA regions          Excavate & measure
                                      Determine severity
                                                     Strength evaluation  Interval assessment
                                                                     Evaluate protection
                                                     Root cause analysis
                                                                     Back to Step one
                      FIGURE 12.16  Overview of the ECDA process.
   544   545   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554