Page 560 - Corrosion Engineering Principles and Practice

522 C h a p t e r 1 2 C o r r o s i o n a s a R i s k 523

6. Singh B, Britton J, Poblete B, Smith G. The 3 R’s—Risk rust and reliability.
CORROSION 2005, Paper # 553. Houston, Tex.: NACE International, 2005.
7. McIntire DR, Dillon CP. Guidelines for Preventing Stress Corrosion Cracking in the
Process Industries. Columbus, Ohio: Materials Technology Institute, 1985.
8. Queen DME, Ridd BR, Packman C. Key performance indicators for dem-
onstrating effective corrosion management in the Oil and Gas Industry.
CORROSION 2001, Paper # 056. Houston, Tex., NACE International, 2001.
9. McNeeney A. Selecting the right key performance indicators. Maintenance
Technology 2005; 18: 27–34.
10. Marine Risk Assessment. Contract Research Report 2001/0631. Sudbury,
U.K.: Health and Safety Executive (HSE), 2002.
11. Wintle JB, Kenzie BW, Amphlett GJ, Smalley S. Best practice for risk based
inspection as a part of plant integrity management. Contract Research Report
363/2001. Sudbury, U.K.: Health and Safety Executive (HSE), 2001.
12. Fault Tree Analysis Application Guide. Rome, N.Y.: Reliability Analysis
Center (RAC), 1990.
13. Roberge PR. Handbook of Corrosion Engineering. New York, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill,
2000.
14. Roberge PR. Modeling corrosion processes. In: Cramer DS, Covino BS, eds.
Vol. 13A: Corrosion: Fundamentals, Testing, and Protection. Metals Park, Ohio:
ASM International, 2003; 430–45.
15. Rivera M, Bolinger S, Wollenweber C. Carbonate cracking risk assessment
for a FCCU gas plant. CORROSION 2004, Paper # 639. Houston, Tex.: NACE
International, 2004.
16. Risk-Based Inspection. ANSI/API RP 580. 1st edn. Washington, D.C.: American
Petroleum Institute, 2002.
17. Report on Current Practices. DNV Report No. 2004-0305. Hovik, Norway: DNV
Library Services, 2005.
18. Vieth PH. Comprehensive, long-term integrity management programs are
being developed and implemented to reduce the likelihood of pipeline failures.
Materials Performance 2002; 41: 16–22.
19. Kroon DH. External corrosion direct assessment of buried pipelines: The
Process. Materials Performance 2003; 42: 28–32.
20. ASME B31G—Manual for Determining the Remaining Strength of Corroded
Pipelines. New York, N.Y.: American Society of Mechanical Engineers
(ASME), 1992.
21. DNV-RP-F101 Corroded Pipelines. Høvik, Norway: Det Norske Veritas, 2004.
22. Roberge PR. Corrosion Inspection and Monitoring. New York, N.Y.: John Wiley &
Sons, 2007.
23. NACE RP0502-2002—Standard Recommended Practice for Pipeline
External Corrosion Direct Assessment Methodology. Houston, Tex.: NACE
International, 2002.
24. Tadepally VP, Hendren ES. Internal corrosion direct assessment: Refining the
method through new decision support models. CORROSION 2005, Paper # 178.
Houston, Tex., NACE International, 2005.
25. Waker, S., Rosca, G, and Hylton, M. In-line inspection tool selection.
CORROSION 2004, Paper # 168. Houston, Tex.: NACE International, 2004.