Page 261 - Creating Spiritual and Psychological Resilience
P. 261
230 Index
FEMA. See Federal Emergency Management Hurricane Katrina, models for collaborations
Agency following, 125–132
Fixity, 200 background, 126
Forensic psychiatrist, 76 descriptive experiences, 127–131
Fragmentation, xvi church-based shelters, 127–130
Fundamental human motives, emotions as, 28 model for “spiritual supervision,”
130–131
G evacuee statistics, 126
low-income people, 126
Generativity, activities of, 223 preexisting medical condition, 126
Global trauma, 157. See also Ethnomedical psychiatrists, disadvantaged, 125
competence resilience of individuals, 130
God, anger at, 151 spiritual supervision, 131
God Box, 113 volunteer psychiatrists, 128
Grief Hygiene kits, 88
assumption about, 25
implication in working with, 26 I
Ground Zero, 153, 216
IASC. See Inter-Agency Standing Committee
H Identity, emotional, 34
Incident Command System, 6
Hawaiian Red Cross disaster mental health Information availability, bias of, 43
program, 149 Integrative psychosocial resilience (IPR), 158,
Health Insurance Portability and 164
Accountability Act (HIPAA), 79, 81 Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC), 162
HIPAA. See Health Insurance Portability and Intergenerational syndrome, 198
Accountability Act Internal dimension, retraumatization, 196
Hope, 85, 90 Interpersonal emotional experience, 29
Hurricane Katrina, 75 IPR. See Integrative psychosocial resilience
post-Katrina organizational silver lining,
104 L
psychiatrist–spiritual care provider
exchange following, 131 Legal considerations. See Ethical and legal
use of churches as shelters following, 86 considerations
Hurricane Katrina, collaboration following, Local worlds, 20
97–104 Lutheran Disaster Response, 115
background, 97–99
boundary management, communities of M
practice and, 101
correlation with literature, 99–103 Malpractice, liability, 79
organizations Mass media, 53–61
individual level within, 104 backlash, 119
notion about, 100 benefit to risk communicators, 54
worlds in, 103 challenges, 54
participant energy and engagement, 103 frequently asked questions, 65–66
patching, 101 functional needs of, 57–58
personal nonnegotiable, 104 interaction with risk communicators,
post-Katrina organizational silver lining, 55–57
104 negative effect of publicity, 77
real work done, 102 partnering with credible sources, 59–60
strategic thinking, 102 partnership with risk communicators, 55
Substantive Change committee, 98 questions asked during disease outbreaks,
tension in system, 101 67–69
theory of planning, 100 reporters, 58